Cul-de-sac of Czech Research Evaluation Policy

ZLATUŠKA, Jiří. Cul-de-sac of Czech Research Evaluation Policy. 1st ed. Pardubice: MŠMT, 2010, p. 37-44, 15 pp.

Basic information

• Original name: Cul-de-sac of Czech Research Evaluation Policy
• Authors: ZLATUŠKA, Jiří.
• Edition: 1. vyd. Pardubice, p. 37-44, 15 pp. 2010.
• Publisher: MŠMT

Other information

• Type of outcome: Proceedings paper
• Field of Study: Documentation, librarianship, work with information
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• WWW: URL URL
• Organization unit: Faculty of Informatics
• Keywords (in Czech): hodnocení výzkumu; politická manipulace; nekompetence
• Keywords in English: research evaluation; political manipulation; incompetency
• Tags: International impact, Reviewed

Abstract

The talk will focus on principal problems of the methodology for research evaluation and research finance allocation introduced recently in the Czech Republic. Problems from bibliometric and systemic point of view will be shown, and some comparisons with international experience as well as indications from pilot exercises will be made. Based on the wealth of accessible international expertise on both bibliometrics and research evaluation, conclusions concerning quality and professional ethics entering major public policy decisions in the area of research policy will be drawn.

Abstract (in Czech)

Základní problémy metodologie hodnocení výzkumu v České republice a alokace finančních prostředků na něj navázané, přehled podložených přístupů a kritiky a důsledky týkající se kvality i profesní etiky ze situace vyplývající.

Abstract (in English)

The talk will focus on principal problems of the methodology for research evaluation and research finance allocation introduced recently in the Czech Republic. Problems from bibliometric and systemic point of view will be shown, and some comparisons with international experience as well as indications from pilot exercises will be made. Based on the wealth of accessible international expertise on both bibliometrics and research evaluation, conclusions concerning quality and professional ethics entering major public policy decisions in the area of research policy will be drawn.