VEVERKOVÁ, Lenka, Ivan ČAPOV, Václav JEDLIČKA, Jan ŽÁK, Petr VLČEK, Adam PEŠTÁL, Jan KALAČ, Zdeněk WILHELM a Jan DOLEŽEL. TREATMENT OF LARGE INFECTED CHEST WOUNDS. In 4th Congres of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies, September 2-6,2012 PACIFICO YOKOHAMA, Yokohama Japan. 2012.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název TREATMENT OF LARGE INFECTED CHEST WOUNDS
Autoři VEVERKOVÁ, Lenka (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Ivan ČAPOV (203 Česká republika, domácí), Václav JEDLIČKA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan ŽÁK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr VLČEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Adam PEŠTÁL (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan KALAČ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zdeněk WILHELM (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jan DOLEŽEL (203 Česká republika, domácí).
Vydání 4th Congres of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies, September 2-6,2012 PACIFICO YOKOHAMA, Yokohama Japan, 2012.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Konferenční abstrakt
Obor 30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Stát vydavatele Japonsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/12:00060898
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky Treatment infection chest wounds
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam
Změnil Změnil: Mgr. Michal Petr, učo 65024. Změněno: 10. 10. 2012 14:40.
Anotace
Introduction:In clinical practice we often need to decide a correct method for the treatment of the chest wall following trauma, empyema, or local infection. Various methods are available and their aim is the same – to cure the patient’s defect. There are recommended and tried methods of treatment of these serious and often life-threatening defects. Nowadays treatment may also involve NPWT. Method:In the period between June 2010 and January 2011 we researched 8 patients with chest defect after surgery who were treated using NPWT and compared their results with those of patients treated with traditional methods prior to 2010 e.g. Eloesser window in pleural empyema. We evaluated the length of treatment, wound size, onset of infection, pain and the price of treatment. We assessed wound size using the method of WHAT. Results:The patients’ average age was 65.7 years, in the range of 45 – 73 years. The average wound size 17 x 11.6 cm. Treatment with NWPT averaged 12 days, and changed every 4.5 days. All wounds were culture positive: 3 staphylococcus aureus,1 MRSA, 2 alpha hemolytic streptococcus, the others were polymicrobial. There were no mortalities. All wounds healed without muscle flaps, 3 underwent delayed primary closure, 2 split-thickness skin graft, and three healed by secondary intention. There was no significant complication. Conclusion: The NPWT system is a feasible alternative to conventional wound care with infected wounds. Our results show that NPWT is more benficial to the patient, it involves a shorter period of treatment
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 25. 4. 2024 11:24