Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
ŘEHULKOVÁ, Hana. Angloamerická recepce Ingardenova pojetí uměleckého literárního díla. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015, 123 s. Spisy Filozofické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, sv. 441. ISBN 978-80-210-8058-4. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8058-2015.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1341706
Bibliografie |
---|
BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. (1966). Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present. New York: The Macmillan Company. |
BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. (1981). Aesthetics. Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Indianapolis – Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. |
BLECHA, Ivan (2007). Proměny fenomenologie. Praha: Triton. |
BRINKER, Menachem (1984). Roman Ingarden and the „Appropriate Aesthetic Attitude“ to the Literary Work of Art. In: Poetics Today. Vol. 5, no. 1. |
BRINKER, Menachem (1980). Two Phenomenologies of Reading: Ingarden and Iser on Textual Indeterminacy. In: Poetics Today. Vol. 1, no. 4. |
BRUNIUS, Teddy (1970). The Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 30, no. 4. |
COLOMB, Gregory R. (1976). Roman Ingarden and the Language of Art and Science. In: The Journal of Aesthetisc and Art Criticism. Vol. 35, no. 1. |
CURRIE, Gregory. Work and Text. In: Mind. Vol. 100, no. 3, 1991. V nepublikované překladu R. Niederleho. |
ČAPEK, Karel (1956). Hordubal, Povětroň, Obyčejný život. Praha: Československý spisovatel. |
ČERNÝ, Václav (1992). Poslední Čapkovo tvůrčí období a jeho demokratický humanismus. In: Tvorba a osobnost I. Praha: Odeon. |
DAVIES, Stephen (2005). Ontology of Art. In: Levinson, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan, McCORMICK, Peter (eds.) (1989). On aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Interpretations and Assessements. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic. |
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan (1989). Ingarden’s Theory of Values and the Evaluation of the Work of Art. In: Dziemidok, B., McCormick, P. (eds.). On Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1989. |
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan (1975). Roman Ingarden’s View on the Aesthetic Attitude. In: Graff, P., Kazemien-Ojak, S. (eds.). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics: Essays. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers. |
FALK, Eugen H. (1981). Ingarden’s Concept of the Aesthetic Object. In: Comparative Literature Studies. Vol. 18, no. 3. |
GALEWICZ, Wladzimierz (1990). The Aesthetic Object and the Work of Art: Reflections on Ingarden’s Theory of Aesthetic Judgement. In: Rudnick, H. H. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
GRAFF, Piotr, KAZIMIEN-OJAK, Slaw (eds.) (1975). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics: Essays. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers. |
HOWELL, Robert (2002). Ontology and the nature of the literary work. In: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 60. |
HUSSERL, Edmund (2001). Idea fenomenologie. Praha: OIKOYMENH. |
HUSSERL, Edmund (2004). Ideje k čisté fenomenologii a fenomenologické filosofii I. Praha: OIKOYMENH. |
HUSSERL, Edmund (1968). Karteziánské meditace. Praha: Svoboda. |
HUSSERL, Edmund (1972). Krize evropských věd a transcendentální fenomenologie. Praha: Academia. |
HUSSERL, Edmund (2010). Logická zkoumání II/1. Zkoumání k fenomenologii a teorii poznání. Praha: OIKOYMENH. |
CHOJNA, Wojciech (2009). Roman Ingarden. In: Davies, S. (ed.). A Companion to Aesthetics. Wiley – Blackwell. |
CHRUDZIMSKI, Arkadiusz (ed.) (2005). Existence, Culture, and Persons: the Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: Ontos. |
INGARDEN, Roman, FIZER John, HERSHEL B. (1970). Chipp. Letters Pro and Con. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 28, no. 4. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1961). A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 20, no. 2. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1962). A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics, part II. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 20, no. 3. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1961). Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 21, no. 3. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1964). Artistic and Aesthetic Values. In: British Journal of Aesthtetics. Vol. 4. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1987). Artistic and Aesthetic Values. In: Margolis, J. (ed.). Philosophy Looks at the Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. |
INGARDEN, Roman (2003). Fenomenologická estetika: Pokus o vymezení oblasti bádání. In Zuska, V. (ed.). Umění, krása, šeredno. Praha: Karolinum. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1967). O poznávání literárního díla. Praha: Československý spisovatel. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1966). Studia z estetyki. Tom 1. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1966). Studia z estetyki. Tom 2. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1970). Studia z estetyki. Tom 3. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. |
INGARDEN, Roman (1989). Umělecké dílo literární. Praha: Odeon. |
ISEMINGER, Gary (2005). Aesthetics Experience. In: Levinson, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
ISEMINGER, Gary (1973). Roman Ingarden and the Aesthetics Object. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 33, no. 3. |
JACOB, Pierre. Intentionality. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality/ |
JOYCE, James (1988). Dubliňané. Překlad Aloys Skoumal. Praha: Odeon. |
KAELIN, Eugen F. (1990). The Debate over Stratification within Aesthetic Objects. In: Rudnick, H. H. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana. Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
KOCKELMANS, Joseph J.(1999). Phenomenology. In: Audi, R. (ed.). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
MARAS, Steven (1998). The Bergsonian Model of Actualization. In: SubStance. Vol. 27, no. 1. |
MARGOLIS, Joseph (ed.) (1987). Philosophy Looks at the Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. |
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk (1975). Places of Indeterminacy in a Literary Work . In: Graff, P., Krzemien-Ojak, S. (eds.). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers. |
McCORMICK, Peter (1989). Literary Truths and Metyphysical Qualities. In: Dziemidok, B., McCormick, P. (eds.). On Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic. |
McHALL, Brian (1987). Postmodernist Lyric and the Ontology of Poetry. In: Poetics Today. Vol. 8, no. 1. |
MITSCHERLING, Jeff (2005). Concretization, Literary Criticism, and the Life of Literary Work. In: Chrudzimski, A. (ed.). Existence, Culture, and Persons. Frankfurt: Ontos. |
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. Ingarden. In: Kelly, M. (ed.) (1998). Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. |
MITSCHERLING, Jeff (1985). Roman Ingarden’s „The Literary Work of Art“: Exposition and Analysis. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 45, no. 3. |
MITSCHERLING, Jeff (1997). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. |
MORRIS, Charles (1983). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
NIEDERLE, Rostislav (2014). Pojmy estetiky: analytický přístup. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
OSBORN, Harold (ed.) (1972). Aesthetics. London: Oxford University Press. |
POLI, Roberto. Nikolai Hatrmann. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nicolai-hartmann/ |
PROCHÁZKA, M. Roman Ingarden. In: Zeman, M. (a kol.) (1988). Průvodce po světové literární teorii. Praha: Panorama, 1988. |
RISKA, Augustin (1976). Language and Logic in the Work of Roman Ingarden. In: Tymieniecka, A.-T. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana. Vol. IV. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Company. |
RUDNICKA, Hans H. (ed.) (1990). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
RUDNICK, Hans H. (1976). Roman Ingarden’s Literary Theory. In: Tymieniecka, A.-T. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. IV. Dortrecht – Holland: Reidel Publishing Company. |
RUDNICK, Hans H. (1981).The Historicity of the Literary Work of Art: An Ingardenian Perspective. In: Comparative Literature Studies. Vol. 18, no. 3. |
SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de (1989). Kurs obecné lingvistiky. Praha: Odeon. |
SHUSTERMAN, Richard (1989). Ingarden, Inscription, and Literary Ontology. In: Dziemidok, B., McCormick, P. (eds.). On Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic. |
SIMONS, Peter (1994). Strata in Ingarden’s Ontology. In: Galewicz, W., Stroker, E., Strozewski, W. (eds.). Kunst und ontologie. Amsterdam: Rodopi. |
SMITH, Barry (1978). An Essay in Formal Ontology. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien. Vol. 6. |
SMITH, Barry (1980). Ingarden vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction. In: Philosophy and Phenomenology Research. Vol. 41. |
STRELKA, Joseph P. (1990). Roman Ingarden’s „Points of Indeterminateness“: A Consideration of Their Practical Application to Literary Criticism. In: Rudnick, H. H. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
SWIRSKI, Peter (1998). Literature and Literary Knowledge. In: The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association. Vol. 31, no. 2. |
ŠALDA, F. X. (1978). Dvě románové balady z Podkarpadské Rusi. In: O předpokladech a povaze tvorby. Praha: Československý spisovatel. |
THOMASSON, Amie (1996). Fiction and Intentionality. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 56, no. 2. |
THOMASSON, Amie. Roman Ingarden. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ingarden/ |
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. (ed.) (1976). Analecta Husserliana. Vol. IV. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Company. |