Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
DONTCHEVA-NAVRÁTILOVÁ, Olga. Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions. Online. 1., elektronické vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2017, 170 s. Spisy Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, sv. 134. ISBN 978-80-210-8858-0. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8858-2017.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1403297
Bibliografie |
---|
Abu Jaber, K. (2001) ‘Language and diplomacy.’ In : Kurbalija, J., Slavik, H. (eds.) Language and Diplomacy. DiploProjects. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies. 49–54. |
Adam, M. (2005) “Who is who: Functional pressure of the dynamic semantic tracks.” In: Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Brno: Masaryk University. 7–14. |
Akman, V. (2000) ‘Rethinking context as a social construct.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32, 743–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00067-3 |
Askehave, I., Swales, J. (2001) ‘Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution.’ Applied Linguistics 2/22, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195 |
Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Bach, K., Harnish, R. M. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. |
Bach, K., Harnish, R. M. (1992) ‘How performatives really work: A reply to Searle.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635834 |
Бахтин, M. M. (1975) Вопросы литературы и эстетики. Исследования разных лет. Москва: Художественная литература. |
Beaugrande, R. de, Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. |
Bhatia, V. A. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman. |
Bhatia, V. A. (2002) ‘Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.’ Ibérica 4, 3–19. |
Bhatia, V. A. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum. |
Bhatia, V., Langton, M., Lung, J. (2004) ‘Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics.’ In: Connor, U., Upton, T. A. (eds) Discourse in the Professions. Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 203–229. |
Biber, D. (1994) ‘An analytical framework for register studies.’ In: Biber, D., Finegan, E. (eds) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 31–56. |
Biber, D. (2006). University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
Biber, D., Barbieri, F. (2007) ‘Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers.’ English for Specific Purposes 26, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 |
Biber, D., Finegan, E. (1986) ‘An initial typology of English text types.’ In: Tottie, G., Bächlund, I. (ed.) English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensai 60. 19–46. |
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. |
Blakemore, D. (1992) Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Brown, G., Levinson, S. C. (1978) Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Bublitz, W. (1997) ‘Introduction: Views on coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–7. |
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., Coulthard, M. (eds) (1996) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. |
Cap, P. (2007) ‘Proximization: A methodological account of legitimization strategies in Post-9/11 US Political Discourse.’ Topics in Linguistics, 1/1, 13–17. |
Carter, R. (1997) Investigating English Discourse. London, New York: Routledge. |
Carter, R., Simpson, P. (1989) Language, Discourse and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics. London, New York: Routledge. |
Čechová, M. (1989) ‘Charakteristika administrativního stylu.’ Naše řec 72, 1, 1–10. |
Čechová, M., J. Chloupek, M. Krčmová, E. Minářová (1997) Stylistika současné češtiny. Praha: Institut sociálních vztahů. |
Chafe, W. (1992[2003]) ‘Discourse: Overview.’ In: Bright, W. (ed. 1992), Frawley (ed.) (2003) International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. |
Chamonikolasová, J. (1987) ‘Loose elements in colloquial English.’ In: Brno Studies in English 17, 97–105. |
Charrow, V. R. (1982) ‘Language in the bureaucracy.’ In: Di Pietro, R. J. (ed.) Linguistics and the Professions. Advances in Discourse processes vol. VIII. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 173–188. |
Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. |
Chilton, P., Schäfner, C. (2002) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
Crystal, D., D. Davy (1969) Investigating English Style. London: Longman. |
Cohen, R. (2001) ‘Language and negotiation: A Middle East lexicon.’ In: Kurbalija, J., Slavik, H. (eds.) Language and Diplomacy. DiploProjects. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies. 67–92. |
Connor, U. (1996) Contrastive Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Corbett, J. (2006) ‘Genre and genre analysis.’ In: Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 26–32. |
Coulthard, M. (1977) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman. |
Coulthard, M. (1985) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Longman. |
Coulthard, M. (1987) ‘Evaluative text analysis.’ In: Steel, R., Threadgold, T. (eds) Language Topics. Essays in Honour of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. 2. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 181–190. |
Daneš, F. (1974) ‘Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text.’ In: Daneš, F. (ed.) Papers of Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia. 106–128. |
Daneš, F, (1995) ‘Paragraph – A central unit of the thematic and compositional build-up of texts.’ In: Warwick, B., Tanskanen, S.K., Hiltunen, R. (eds.) Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Turku: University of Turku. 29–40. |
Danet, B. (1985) ‘Legal discourse.’ In: Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 1. London: Academic Press. 273–291. |
Donahue, R. T., Prosser, M. H. (1997) Diplomatic Discourse: International Conflict at the United Nations – Addresses and Analysis. Greenwich, CT, London: Ablex. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2004a) ‘Situational characteristics of the discourse of international governmental organizations: UNESCO resolutions and declarations.’ Acta Academica Karviniensis 1/2004, 25–41. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2004b) Style Markers of Diplomatic Discourse. Text Analysis of UNESCO Resolutions. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Masarykova Univerzita v Brně. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2005a) ‘Politeness strategies in institutional speech acts. In: Povolná, R. Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Brno: Masaryk University. 15–29. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2005b) ‘Supplementive clauses in resolutions.’ In: Chovanec, J. (ed.) Theory and Practice in English Studies 3. Proceedings from the Eighth Conference on British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masaryk University. 48–56. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2005c) ‘Text organization: Development in the structure of UNESCO ‘Resolutions’ volumes.’ Acta Academica Karviniensis 2/2005, 16–36. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2006) ‘Text colonies revisited: Clause relations in colony texts.’ In: Discourse and Interaction 2. Sborník prací Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy university v Brně. Brno: Masaryková Univerzita. 43–56. |
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2007) ‘Cohesion in colony texts.’ In: Silesian Studies in English 2006. International Conference of English and American Studies (Proceedings). Opava: Slezská univerzita v Opavě. 51–61. |
Downes, W. (1998) Language and Society. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Downing, A. (1995) ‘Thematic layers focus assignments in Chaucer’s General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales.’ In: Ghadessy, M. (ed.) Thematic Development in English Texts. London: Pinter. 147–163. |
Downing, A., Lavid, J. (1998) ‘Information processing strategies in administrative forms.’ In: Sanchez-Macarro, A., Carter, R. (eds) Linguistic Choice Across Genres. Variation in Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 99–116. |
Duranti, A. (1985) ‘Sociocultural dimension of discourse.’ In: Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 1. London: Academic Press. 273–291. |
Dušková, L. et al. (1988) Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha: Academia. |
Enkvist, N. E. (1989) ‘Styles as parameters in text strategy.’ In: Van Peer (ed.) W. The Taming of the Text. London, New York: Routledge. 125–151. |
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman. |
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. |
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman. |
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. |
Fairclough, N. (2006) ‘Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view.’ In: Lassen, I., Strunck, J., Vestergaard, T. (eds) Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 19–36. |
Fetzer, A. (2002) ‘“Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem”: Sincerity and credibility in political interviews.’ In: Chilton, P., C. Schäfner (eds) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 173–202. |
Fetzer, A. (2004) Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
Firbas, J. (1987) ‘On two starting points of communication.’ In: Steel, R., Threadgold, T. (eds) Language Topics. Essays in Honour of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. 1. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 23–45. |
Firbas, J. (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Firth, J. R. (1957) Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Fowler, R. (1985) ‘Power.’ In: Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 4. London: Academic Press. 61–82. |
Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Fowler, R. (1991) Language in the News. London, New York: Routledge. |
Giora, R. (1985) ‘Towards a theory of coherence.’ Poetics Today 6(4), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771962 |
Giora, R. (1997) ‘Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory.’ Journal of Pragmatics 27, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00065-8 |
Grice, P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation.’ In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. L. (eds) Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58. |
Goddard, C. (1998) Semantic Analysis. A Practical Introduction. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. |
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Gustafsson, M. (1975) Binominal Expression in Present-day English. Turku: Turun Yliopisto. |
Hajičová, E. (1993) Issues of sentence structure and discourse patterns. Theoretical and Computational Linguistics. vol 2. Prague: Charles University Press. |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1971) ‘Linguistic function and literary style.’ In: Freeman, D.C. (ed.) Essays in Modern Stylistics. London, New York: Methuen. 325–361. |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold. |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985a) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985b) Spoken and Written Language. Victoria: Deakin University Press. |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) ‘Register variation.’ In: Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 29–43. |
Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. New York: Longman. |
Hasan, R. (1989a) ‘The texture of a text.’ In: Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 70–96. |
Hasan, R. (1989b) ‘The structure of a text.’ In: Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 52–69. |
Hatim, B. (1997) Communication Across Cultures. Translation Theory and Contrastive Text Linguistics. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. |
Havránek, B. (1983) ‘The functional differentiation of Standard language.’ In: Vachek, J. (ed.) Pragiana. Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistic School. Praha: Academia. 143–164. |
Hiltunen, R. (1990) Chapters on Legal English. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. |
Hodge, R., Kress, G. (1979) Language as Ideology. London, New York: Routledge. |
Hoey, M. (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. Lomdon: Allen and Unwin. |
Hoey, M. (1986) ‘The discourse colony: A preliminary study of a neglected discourse type.’ In: Coulthard R. M. (ed.) Talking about Text. Studies Presented to David Brasil on His Retirement. English Language Research. University of Birmingham. 1–26. |
Hoey, M. (1988) ‘The discourse properties of the criminal stature.’ In: Nixon, G., J. Honey (eds) An Historic Tongue: Studies in Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge. 145–166. |
Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Hoey, M. (1996) ‘A clause-relational analysis of selected dictionary entries.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. 150–165. |
Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Routledge. |
Holmes, J. (1992) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman. |
Holmes, J. (1995) Men, Women and Politeness. London: Longman. |
Huddleston, R., Pullum, G. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Hughes, J. (1984) ‘Group speech acts.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631073 |
Hunston, S. (2007) ‘Using corpus to investigate stance quantatively and qualitatively.’ In: Englebretson, R. (ed). Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2007. 27–48. |
Hyland, K. (2008) ‘As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation.’English for Specific Purposes 27, 4–21. |
Hymes, D. (1975) Foundations in Sociolinguistics. An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. |
Jakobson, R. (1990[1960]) On Language. London, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
Johnes, A. (1997) Text, Role and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Johnson Ch. W. (2003) How Our Laws Are Made. U.S. House of Representatives. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/useftp.cgi?/paddress=162.140.64.21&filename =hd093.108&directory=/diskb/wais/data/108_cong_documents, 15/8/2004. |
Jucker, A. H. (2002) ‘Hypertextlinguistics: Textuality and typology of hypertexts.’ In: Fischer, A., Tottie, G., Lehmann, H. M. (eds) Text Types and Corpora. Studies in Honour of Udo Fries. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 29–51. |
King, G. (2000) Punctuation. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers. |
Knittlová, D. (1990) Funkční styly v angličtině a češtině. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. |
Kortmann, B. (1991) Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English. London, New York: Routledge. |
Kristeva, J. (1969) Sémiotique. Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil. |
Kurbalija, J. (2001) ‘Hypertext in diplomacy.’ In: Kurbalija, J., Slavik, H. (eds.) Language and Diplomacy. DiploProjects. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies. 307–335. |
Le, E. (2002) ‘Themes and hierarchical structure of written texts.’ In: Louwerse, M., van Peer, W. (eds) Thematics. Interdisciplinary Studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 171–188. |
Leech, G. (1969) A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London, New York: Longman. |
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London, New York: Longman. |
Leech, G., Short, M. (1981) Style in Fiction. London, New York: Longman. |
Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1975) A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman. |
Lemke, J. L. (1995) Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics, London: Taylor & Francis. |
Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Malá, M. (2005) ‘Semantic roles of adverbial participial clauses.’ In: Chovanec, J. (ed.) Theory and Practice in English Studies 3. Proceedings from the Eighth Conference on British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masaryk University. 91–97. |
Malinowski, B. (1923) ‘The problem of meaning in primitive languages.’ In: Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. The Meaning of Meaning. London, New York: Routledge. 296–336. |
Martin, J. R. (1985) ‘Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis.’ In: Benson, J. and Graves, W. (eds) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 248–274. |
Martin, J. R. (1992) English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
Mateucci, A. (2001) ‘Language and diplomacy – A practitioner’s view.’ In: Kurbalija, J., Slavik, H. (eds.) Language and Diplomacy. DiploProjects. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies. 55–65. |
Mathesius, V. (1942[1982]) ‘Řeč a sloh.’ In: Mathesius V. Jazyk, kultura a slovesnost. Praha: Odeon. 92–146. |
Mey, J. (1991) ‘Text, context and social control.’ Journal of Pragmatics 16, 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90133-I |
Mey, J. (2001) Pragmatics. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In: Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Brno: Masaryk University. 85–98. |
Miššíková, G. (2007) Analysing Translation as Text and Discourse. Praha: JTP. |
Morgan, J.L. (1991) ‘Two types of conventions in indirect speech acts’. In: Davis, S. (ed.) Pragmatics. A Reader. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 242–253. |
Mukařovský, J. (1983) ‘Standard language and poetic language.’ In Vachek, J. (ed.) Pragiana. Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistic School. Praha: Academia. 165–185. |
Ng, S. H., Bradac, J. J. (1993) Power in Language. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage. |
Östman, J-O. (1997) ‘Coherence through understanding through discourse patterns: Focus on news reports.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 77–100. |
Pípalová, R. (2008) ‘Exploring paragraphs from the outside.’ Discourse and Interaction 1/1, 99–114. |
Pípalová, R. (2008) Thematic Organization of Paragraphs and Higher Text Units. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická fakulta. |
Povolná, R. (2003) Spatial and Temporal Adverbials in Authentic Face-to Face Conversation. Spisy pedagogické fakulty, svazek 87. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2009) ‘Cohesion and coherence in English discourse.’ In: Hůlková, I., Jančaříková, R. (eds) Exploring Cohesion and Coherence in English Discourse. Third Brno Conference on Linguistic Studies in English. Brno: Masaryk Uniersity, Faculty of Education. 5–9. |
Powell, L. A. (2004) ‘Visualizing co-occurrence structures in political language: Content analysis, multidimensional scaling, and unrooted cluster trees.’ Journal of Diplomatic Language, 1(4). http://www.jdlonline.org/IIIWaller.html. 22/7/2008. |
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. |
Reimer, M. (1995) ‘Performative utterances: A reply to Bach and Harnish.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983301 |
Reisigl, M., Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination. London, New York: Routledge. |
Sarangi, S. (2004) “Mediated interpretation of hybrid textual environments.” Text 24(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.011 |
Sarangi, S., Slembrouck, S. (1996) Language, Bureaucracy and Social Control. London: Addison Wesley Longman Limited. |
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Scott, M., Johns, T., Murison-Bowie, S. (1993) MicroConcord (Program and Manual). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Searle, J. (1975) ‘A taxonomy of illocutionary acts’. In: Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind and Knowledge. Gunderson, K. (ed.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 344–369. |
Searle, J. (1989) ‘How performatives work’. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 535–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627773 |
Searle, J. (1991) ‘Indirect speech acts’. In: Davis, S. (ed.) Pragmatics. A Reader. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 265–277. |
Sebeok, T. (ed.) (1986) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. |
Seidlhofer, B., Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in summary: The Contexts of appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205–219. |
Sgall, P. (1994) ‘Meaning, reference and discourse patterns.’ In: Luelsdorff, P. (ed.) Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 277–309. |
Short, M. (1996) Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London, New York: Longman. |
Short, M., Van Peer, W. (1989) ‘Accident! Stylisticians evaluate: Aims and Methods of Stylistic Analysis.’ In: Short M. (ed.) Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature. London, New York: Longman. 22–71. |
Simpson, R. C. (2004) ‘Stylistic features of academic speech: The role of formulaic expressions.’ In: Connor, U., Upton, T. A. (eds.) Discourse in the Professions. Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 37–64. |
Sinclair, J., Coulthard, M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Šlancarová, D. (1999) ‘On the use of italics in English and Czech.’ Brno Studies in English 25, 59–73. |
Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Svoboda, A. (1989) Kapitoly z funkční syntaxe. Praha: Statní pedagogické nakladatelství. |
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Swales, J. M. (2004) Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Tannen, D. (1982) ‘Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives.’ Language. Journal of the Linguistic Society of America. vol. 58, No 1, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/413530 |
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) Collaborating towards Cohesion. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
Tárnyiková, J. (2002) From Texture to Text. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, 3rd ed. |
Thompson, S. (1994) ‘Cohesion in Monologue.’ Applied Linguistics 15/1, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.1.58 |
Todorov, T. (1978) Les Genres du Discourse. Paris: Seuil. |
Tomášková, R. (2008) ‘Textové kolonie jako organizační princip a komunikační strategie v časopisech pro ženy a pro muže.’ In: Tomášková, R., Wilamová, S., Hopkinson, C. (eds) Autorský záměr a jeho cesta k adresátovi. Komunikační a textové strategie v masmediálním, komerčním a akademickém diskurzu. Ostrava: Universitas Ostraviensis. 68–76. |
Toolan, M. (1997) ‘What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it?’ Language and Literature 6, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709700600201 |
Trosborg, A. (1995) ‘Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of law’. Journal of Pragmatics 23, 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00034-C |
Trosborg, A. (1997a) Rhetorical Strategies in Legal Language. Discourse Analysis of Statutes and Contracts. Tübingen: Gunther Narr. |
Trosborg, A. (1997b) ‘Text typology: Register, genre and text type.’ In: Trosborg, A. (ed.) Text Typology and Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–23. |
The Compact Oxford English Dictionary (Second Edition) (1991) Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Uhlířová, L. (1974) ‘O vztahu sémantiky příslovečného určení k aktuálnímu členění’. Slovo a slovesnost 35, 99–106. |
Urbanová, L. (2008) Stylistika anglického jazyka. Brno: Barrister & Principal. |
Urbanová, L., Billingham, A. (1985) Reader in English Stylistics. Prešov. |
Urbanová, L., Oakland, A. (2002) Úvod do anglické stylistiky. Brno: Barrister & Principal. |
Vachek, J. (1974) Chapters from Modern English Lexicology and Stylistics. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství. |
Vachek, J. (1989) Written Language Revisited. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
Van Dijk, T. (1977) Text and Context. London: Longman. |
Van Dijk, T. (1990) ‘The future of the field: Discourse analysis in the 1990s.’ Text 10(12), 133–156. |
Van Dijk, T. (1993) ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis.’ Discourse and Society, vol. 4 (2), 249–283. |
Van Dijk, T. (1997) ‘Political discourse and racism. Describing others in Western parliaments.’ In: Riggins, S. H. (ed.) The Language and Politics of Exclusion. Others in Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 31–64. |
Van Dijk, T. (2002) ‘Political discourse and political cognition’. In: Chilton, P. A., Schäffner C. (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 204–236. |
Van De Mieroop, D. (2007) ‘The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity’, Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1120–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.009 |
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007) ‘Legitimation in discourse and communication.’ Discourse and Communication Vol.1(1), 91–112. |
Verdonk, P. (2002) Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Virtanen, T. (1992) Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English: Clause Initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Description. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press. |
Waller, L. (2007) ‘Introducing Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis methodology for analyzing Caribbean social problems: Going beyond social practices.’ Journal of Diplomatic Language 4(1). http://www.jdlonline.org/IIIWaller.html. 22/7/2008. |
Wales, K. (2001) A Dictionary of Stylistics. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education. |
Wardhaugh, R. (2002) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Weber, J. J. (1992) Critical Analysis of Fiction: Essays in Discourse Stylistics. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi. |
Widdowson, H. G. (1979) Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Widdowson, H. G. (1995) ‘Discourse analysis: A critical view.’ Language and Literature 4, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400301 |
Widdowson, H. (2007) ‘Text and real language.’ Topics in Linguistics 1/2007, 4–7. |
Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell. |
Winter, E. (1994) ‘Clause relations as information structure: Two basic text structures in English.’ In: Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London, New York: Routledge. 46–68. |
Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse, London: Longman. |
Wodak, R. (2007) ‘Discourse in European Union organizations: Aspects of access, participation and exclusion’, Text and Talk 27–5/6, 655–680. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.030 |
Wodak, R. (2008) ‘Introduction: Discourse studies – Important concepts and terms.’ In: Wodak, R., Krzyźanowski, M. Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 1–29. |
Wodak, R., P. Chilton (eds) (2005) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
Wray, A. (2000) ‘Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice.’ In: Applied Linguistics, vol. 2, No 4. 463–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.463 |
Young, L., Harrison, C. (2004) ‘Bureaucratic discourse: Writing in the ‘comfort zone’.’ In: Young, L., Harrison, C. (eds) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis Studies in Social Change. New York: Continuum. 231–246. |