Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
DVOŘÁK, Petr. Jako jeden muž? Jednota hlasování poslanců v parlamentních demokraciích. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2017. ISBN 978-80-210-8588-6. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8588-2017.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1385084
| Bibliografie |
|---|
| Bundestag. 2014a. Namentliche Abstimmungen (2009–2014) [online]. Dostupné z http://www.bundestag.de/bundestag/plenum/abstimmung/2014. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Bundestag. 2014b. Drucksachen und Plenarprotokolle des Bundestages [online]. Dostupné z http://pdok.bundestag.de/. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Bundestag. 2014c. Namentliche Abstimmungen (2007–2009) [online]. Dostupné z http://webarchiv.bundestag.de/cgi/show.php?fileToLoad=1163&id=1122 Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Firth, D. – A. Spirling. 2003. Divisions of the United Kingdom House of Commons, from 1992 to 2003 and beyond [online]. Dostupné z http://www.warwick.ac.uk/go/tapir/firth-spirling.pdf. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| McCubbins, M. D. 2013. Replication data for „Agenda Control in the German Bundestag, 1987–2002“ [online]. Dostupné z http://mccubbins.us/settingtheagenda/Legislative%20Rules%20and%20Agenda%20Setting%20in%20Germany.zip. |
| Pajala, A. – A. Jakulin. 2015. Plenary Votes in the Finnish Parliament during 1991–2010 [online]. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor], 2012. Dostupné z https://services.fsd.uta.fi/catalogue/FSD2117?lang=en&study_language=en. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| ParlGov. 2015. Döring, H. – P. Manow [online]. Dostupné z http://www.parlgov.org. Ověřeno 31. 3. 2016. |
| Parties and Elections. 2015. Nords, W. [online]. Dostupné z http://www.parties-and-elections.eu. Ověřeno 31. 3. 2016. |
| PČR. 2013a. Data Poslanecké sněmovny a Senátu [online]. Dostupné z http://www.psp.cz/sqw/hp.sqw?k=1300. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| PČR. 2013b. Poslanci a orgány [online]. Dostupné z http://www.psp.cz/sqw/snem.sqw?zvo=1&P1=0&P2=0. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| PČR. 2015. Schůze Poslanecké sněmovny. Informační materiál Parlamentu ČR [online]. Dostupné z http://www.psp.cz/sqw/hp.sqw?k=696. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Public Whip. 2015. Raw Data [online]. Dostupné z http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/project/data.php. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Škop, M. 2011. Voting Records from Slovak Parliament since 1998. KohoVolit.eu [online]. Dostupné z https://classic.scraperwiki.com/scrapers/sk_parliament_voting_records_retrieval/index.html. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Ústava Finské republiky |
| Ústava Slovenské republiky |
| Zákon č. 90/1995 Sb. o jednacím řádu Poslanecké sněmovny |
| Zákon č. 350/1996 Z.z. Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky o rokovacom poriadku Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky |
| Ágh, A. 1999. The Parlamentarization of the East Central European Parties: Party Discipline in the Hungarian Parliament, 1990–1996. In Bowler, S. – D. M. Farrell – R. S. Katz (Eds.). Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, s. 167–188. |
| Andeweg, R. B. 2013. Parties in Parliament: The Blurring of Opposition. In Müller, W. C. – Narud, H. M. (Eds.). Party Governance and Party Democracy. Festschrift to Kaare Strom. New York: Springer, s. 99–114. |
| Andeweg, R. B. – L. Nijzink. 1995. Beyond the Two-Body Image: Relations between Ministers and MPs. S. 152-178 in Döring, H. (Ed.). Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe. Potsdam: Campus Verlag – St. Martin’s Press. |
| Arter, D. 2006. Introduction: Comparing the Legislative Performance of Legislatures. The Journal of Legislative Studies, r. 12, č. 3–4, s. 245–257. |
| Avent, S. R. 1999. Time Series Analysis. An introduction [online]. Dostupné z http://userwww.sfsu.edu/efc/classes/biol710/timeseries/TimeSeriesAnalysis.html. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Bäck, H. 2012. The Ideological Cohesion of Parliamentary Parties and Its Implications for Decision-Making in Modern Democracies. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, r. 114, č. 1, s. 68–76. |
| Bardi, L. – P. Mair. 2008. The Parameters of Party Systems. Party Politics, r. 14, č. 2, s. 147–166. |
| Baumgartner, F. R. – C. Green-Pedersen – B. D. Jones. 2006. Comparative studies of policy agendas. Journal of European Public Policy, r. 13, č. 7, s. 959–974. |
| Bergman, T. – A. Ecker – W. C. Müller. 2013. How Parties Govern: Political Parties and the Internal Organization of Government. In Müller, W. C. – H. M. Narud (Eds.). Party Governance and Party Democracy. Festschrift to Kaare Strom. New York: Springer, s. 33–50. |
| Best, R. E. 2013. How Party System Fragmentation has Altered Political Opposition in Established Democracies. Government and Opposition, r. 48, č. 3, s. 314–342. |
| Bijleveld, C. J. H. et al. 1998. Longitudinal Data Analysis. Designs, Models & Methods. London: Sage. |
| Blau, A. 2008. The Effective Number of Parties at Four Scales. Votes, Seats, Legislative Power and Cabinet Power. Party Politics, r. 14, č. 2, s. 167–187. |
| Blondel, J. 1970. Legislative Behaviour: Some Steps Towards a Cross-National Measurement. In Norton, P. (Ed.). 1990. Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 186–207. |
| Blondel, J. 1997. Political Opposition in the Contemporary World. Government and Opposition, r. 32, č. 4, s. 462–486. |
| Bochsler, D. 2008. Resolving the Puzzle of Party Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: The Joint Impact of Party Nationalisation And Electoral Systems. Disertační práce, University of Geneva. |
| Borz, G. 2006. Determinants of Party Unity in Central Eastern Europe. CEU Political Science Journal, r. 1, č. 3, s. 29–48. |
| Bräuniger, T. – T. Gschwend – S. Shikamo. 2010. Sachpolitik oder Parteipolitik? Eine Bestimmung des Parteidrucks im Bundesrat mittels bayesianischer Methoden. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, r. 51, č. 2, s. 223–249. |
| Bräuninger, T. – M. Debus. 2009. Legislative Agenda-Setting in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, č. 48, s. 804–839. |
| Breunig, Ch. 2008. Legislative Politics in Germany: Some Lessons and Challenges. German Politics, r. 17, č. 3, s. 381–392. |
| Browne, E. C. – Flenderis, J. P. – Gleiber, D. 1984. An „Events“ Approach to the Problem of Cabinet Stability. Comparative Political Studies, r. 17, č. 2, s. 167–197. |
| Brunclík, M. 2009. Negativní parlamentarismus: cesta k efektivnějšímu fungování parlamentního režimu? Acta Politologica, r. 1, č. 3, s. 118–241. |
| Budge, I. et al. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Burkhart, S. – M. Lehnert. 2008. Introduction. Between Consensus and Conflict: Law-Making Processes in Germany. German Politics, r. 17, č 3, s. 223–231. |
| Burkhart, S. – P. Manow. 2006. Kompromiss und Konflikt in parteipolitisierten Föderalismus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Politik, r. 16, č. 3, s. 807–824. |
| Bütikofer, S. – S. Hug. 2008. Strategic Behavior in the Swiss Parliament. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association [online]. Dostupné z: http://www.unige.ch/ses/spo/static/simonhug/sbisp/sbisp.pdf. Ověřeno 13. 2. 2014. |
| Carey, J. M. 2000. Party Unity in Legislative Voting (paper presented at American Political Science Associations Conference, Washington, September 2000) [online]. Dostupné z http://www.researchgate.net/publication/2412757_Party_Unity_in_Legislative_Voting/file/9c9605293d09ea8e1b.pdf. Ověřeno 13. 2. 2014. |
| Carey, J. M. 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legisaltive Voting. American Journal of Political Science, r. 51, č. 1, s. 92–107. |
| Carey, J. M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| Carey, G. W. – J. McClellan (Eds.). 1994 [1990]. Listy Federalistů. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého. |
| Carey, J. M. – M. S. Shugart. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Carey, J. M. – M. S. Shugart. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral studies, r. 14, č. 4, s. 417–439. |
| Chandler, W. – G. W. Cox – M. D. McCubbins. 2006. Agenda Control in the Bundestag, 1980-2002. German Politics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2006. |
| CMP. 2015. Comparative Manifesto Project. Lehmann, P. – T. Matthieß – N. Merz – S. Regel – A. Werner. Manifesto Corpus. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center. |
| Colomer, J. M. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Colomer, J. M. 2005. It’s Parties That Choose the Electoral System (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down). Political Studies, r. 53, č. 1, s. 1–21. |
| Colomer, J. M. 2011. The More Parties, the Greater Policy Stability. European Political Science, č. 11, s. 229–243. |
| Cox, G. W. 2004. Lies, Damned Lies, and Rational Choice Analyses. In Shapiro, I. – R. M. Smith – T. E. Masoud (Eds.). Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 167–185. |
| Cox, G. W. – M. D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Crespin, M. – D. W. Rohde – R. J. Vander Wielen. 2013. Measuring Variations in Party Unity Voting: An Assessment of Agenda Effects. Party Politics, r. 19, č. 3, s. 432–457. |
| Daalder, H. 2011. State Formation, Parties and Democracy: Studies in Comparative European Politics. Colchester: ECPR Press. |
| Dahl, R. A. 1966. Patterns of Opposition. In Dahl, R. A. (Ed.). Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press. |
| Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale: Yale University Press. |
| Dahl, R. A. 2001 [1998]. O demokracii. Průvodce pro občany. Praha: Portál. |
| Depauw, S. – S. Martin. 2008. Legislative Party Discipline and Cohesion in Comparative Perspective. In Giannetti, D. – K. Benoit (Eds.): Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies. London: Routledge, s. 103–120. |
| Diermeier, D. – T. J. Feddersen. 1998. Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure. American Political Science Review, r. 92, č. 3, s. 611–621. |
| Döring, H. (Ed.). 1995. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Potsdam: Campus Verlag – St. Martin’s Press. |
| Döring, H. 2001. Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly, r. 26, č. 1, s. 145–165. |
| Dunleavy, P. – S. Bastow. 2001. Modelling Coalitions that Cannot Coalesce: A Critique of the Laver – Shepsle Approach. West European Politics, r. 24, č. 1, s. 1–26. |
| Duverger, M. 1969 [1951]. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen. |
| Duverger, M. 1980. A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. West-European Journal of Political Research, r. 8, č. 2, s. 165–187. |
| Dvořák, P. 2012. Hledání typologie demokracií pro východní Evropu. Středoevropské politické studie, r. 14, č. 2–3, s. 272–314. |
| Farrell, D. M. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| Fearon, J. D. 1999. Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance. In Przeworski, A. – S. C. Stokes – B. Manin. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 55–97. |
| Ferejohn, J. 1999. Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability. In Przeworski, A. – S. C. Stokes – B. Manin (Eds.). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 131–153. |
| Ferejohn, J. A. – M. P. Fiorina. 1975. Optimizing Models of Public Decision Making. Purposive Models of Legislative Behavior. American Economic Review, r. 65, č. 2, s. 407–414. |
| Fortes, B. G. – I. P. Brihuega. 2012. Testing the Quality of Democracy: The Case of Spain. European Political Science, r. 11, č. 4, s. 492–508. |
| Ganghof, S. 2005. Normative Modelle, institutionelle Typen und beobachtbare Verhaltenmuster: Ein Vorschlag zum Vergleich parlamentarischer Demokratien. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, r. 46, č. 3, s. 406–431. |
| Ganghof, S. 2010. Review Article: Democratic Inclusiveness: A Reinterpretation of Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, r. 40, s. 679–692. |
| Ganghof, S. 2011. Resilient Patterns of Democracy. A Comparative Analysis. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, r. 6, č. 2, s. 103–124. |
| Ganghof, S. 2014. Four Visions of Democracy: Powell’s Elections as Instruments of Democracy and Beyond. Political Studies Review, r. 13, č. 1, s. 69–79. |
| Ganghof, S. 2015. Reconciling Representation and Accountability: Three Visions of Democracy Compared. Government and Opposition, v tisku. Dostupné z http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2597307. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Gerring, J. 2012. Mere Description. British Journal of Political Science, r. 42, č. 4, s. 721–746. |
| Giebler, H. 2012. Bringing Methodology (Back) in: Some Remarks on Contemporary Democacy Measurements. European Political Science, r. 11, č. 4, s. 509–518. |
| Giulj, S. 1981. Confrontation or Conciliation: the Status of the Opposition in Europe. Government and Opposition, r. 16, č. 4, s. 476–494. |
| Golembiewski, R. T. 1958. A Taxonomic Approach to State Political Party Strength. Western Political Quarterly, r. 11, č. 3, s. 494–513. |
| Gregor, K. – V. Havlík. 2013. Příčiny jednotnosti hlasování a složení legislativních koalic v Senátu ve srovnání s Poslaneckou sněmovnou v letech 1998–2010. Sociologický časopis, r. 49, č. 4, s. 549–576. |
| Groseclose, T. – N. McCarty. 2001. The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience. American Journal of Political Science, r. 45, č. 1, s. 100–119. |
| Hakhverdian, A. – Ch. Koop. 2007. Consensus Democracy and Support for Populist Parties in Western Europe. Acta Politica, r. 42, č. 4, s. 401–420. |
| Hall, P. A. – R. C. R. Taylor. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, r. XLIV, s. 936–957. |
| Harfst, P. 2000. Government Stability in Central and Eastern Europe. The Impact of Parliaments and Parties. Paper, ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Copenhagen [online]. Dostupné z https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/d74da79a-d22d-4126-86ae-94db98bb7231.pdf. Ověřeno 24. 4. 2016. |
| Havlík, V. 2011. Česká republika. In Balík, S. – V. Havlík et al. Koaliční vládnutí ve střední Evropě (1990–2010). Brno: Masarykova univerzita, s. 39–90. |
| Heller, W. B. – C. Mershon. 2009. Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| Helms, L. 1998. Perspectives on Government and Opposition in Unified Germany. Politics, r. 18, č. 3, s. 151–158. |
| Helms, L. 2008. Studying Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies: Issues and Perspectives. Journal of Legislative Studies, r. 14, č. 1–2, s. 6–19. |
| Herrmann, M. 2008. Expectations about Coalitions and Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation. Research paper, Universität Mannhein [online]. Dostupné z http://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2317/1/dp08_28.pdf. Ověřeno 24. 4. 2016. |
| Hix, S. – A. Noury. 2008. Government–Opposition or Left–Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Fourteen Parliaments [online]. Dostupné z http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/PSPE/pdf/2008conference_papers/Hix-Noury-GOorLR-01May08.pdf. Ověřeno 20. 3. 2016. |
| Hix, S. – A. Noury. 2016. Government–Opposition or Left–Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures. Political Science Research and Methods, r. 4, č. 2, s. 249–273. |
| Hix, S. – T. Raunio – R. Scully. 1999. An Institutional Theory of Behaviour in the European Parliament. EPRG Working Paper, No. 1 [online]. Dostupné z http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/EPRG/pdf/workingPaper1.pdf. Ověřeno 30. 5. 2015. |
| Hloušek, V. – L. Kopeček. 2012. Záchrana státu? Úřednické a polopolitické vlády v České republice a Československu. Brno: Barrister & Principal. |
| Hough, D. 2010. Political Opposition in the Era of the Grand Coalition (2005–09). German Politics, r. 19, č. 3–4, s. 369–381. |
| Huber, J. D. – G. B. Powell. 1994. Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy. World Politics, r. 46, č. 3, s. 291–326. |
| Hug, S. 2010. Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes. British Journal of Political Science, r. 40, č. 1, s. 225–235. |
| Cheibub, J. A. – F. Limongi. 2010. From Conflict to Coordination: Perspectives on the Study of Executive-Legislative Relations. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos, r. 1, č. 1, s. 38–53. |
| Chytilek, R. 2014. Politický prostor a politická témata. Studie k soutěži politických stran. Brno: CDK. |
| Juul Christiansen, F. – E. Damgaard. 2008. Parliamentary Opposition under Minorty Parliamentarism: Scandinavia. Journal of Legislative Studies, r. 14, č. 1–2, s. 46–76. |
| Kaiser, A. 2002. Alternation, Inclusion and the European Union. European Union Politics, r. 3, č. 4, s. 445–458. |
| Kaiser, A. – M. Lehnert – B. Miller – U. Sieberer. 2002. The Democratic Quality of Institutional Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Political Studies, r. 50, s. 313–331. |
| Kam, Ch. – W. T. Bianco – I. Sened – R. Smyth. 2010. Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament. American Political Science Review, r. 104, č. 2, s. 289–306. |
| Katz, R. – P. Mair. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, r. 1, č. 5, s. 5–28. |
| King, A. 1976. Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, r. 1, č. 1, s. 11–36. |
| King, G. – J. Alt – N. Burns – M. Laver. 1990. A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, r. 34, č. 3, s. 846–871. |
| Kirchheimer, O. 1966. The Transformation of Western-European Party Systems. In La Palombara, J. – M. Weiner (Eds.). Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
| Kmeť, J. 2011. Slovensko. In Balík, S. – V. Havlík et al. Koaliční vládnutí ve střední Evropě (1990–2010). Brno: Masarykova univerzita, s. 183–226. |
| Koehler, D. H. 1975. Legislative Coalition Formation: The Meaning of Minimal Winning Size with Uncertain Participation. American Journal of Political Science, r. 19, č. 1, s. 27–39. |
| Krouwel, A. 2012. Party Transformations in European Democracies. New York: SUNY Press. |
| Kubát, M. 2010. Politická opozice v teorii a středoevropské praxi (vybrané otázky). Praha: Dokořán. |
| Kysela, J. 2003. Poslanecká sněmovna v ústavním systému České republiky (The Chamber of Deputies in the Constitutional System of the Czech Republic). In Linek, L. – L. Mrklas – A. Seidlová – P. Sokol (Eds.). Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2002. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, s. 2–16. |
| Kysela, J. 2008. Parlament a parlamentarismus. In Syllová, J. et al. Parlament České republiky. Praha: Linde, s. 16–49. |
| Laakso, M. – R. Taagepera. 1979. Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, r. 12, s. 3–27. |
| Lane, J.-E. – S. Ersson. 2003. Democracy. A Comparative Approach. London – New York: Routledge. |
| Lanfranchi, P. – R. Lüthi. 1999. Cohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament: Roll Call Voting in the National Council. In Bowler, S. – D. M. Farrell – R. S. Katz (Eds.). Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, s. 99–120. |
| Laver, M. – K. A. Shepsle. 1998. Events, Equilibria, and Government Survival. American Journal of Political Science, r. 42, č. 1, s. 28–54. |
| Laver, M. – K. A. Shepsle. 1999. Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy. In Przeworski, A. – S. C. Stokes – B. Manin. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 279–296. |
| Laver, M. – K. Benoit. 2003. The Evolution of Party Systems between Elections. American Journal of Political Science, r. 47, č. 2, s. 215–233. |
| Laver, M. 1999. Divided Parties, Divided Government. Legislative Studies Quarterly, r. 24, č. 1, s. 5–29. |
| Lees, Ch. 2010. Coalition Dynamics and the Changing German Party System. German Politics and Society, r. 28, č. 3, s. 119–132. |
| Lees, Ch. 2011. Coalition Formation and the German Party System. German Politics, r. 20, č. 1, s. 146–163. |
| Levitt, S. D. 1996. How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology. The American Economic Review, r. 86, č. 3, s. 425–441. |
| Lijphart, A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press. |
| Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press. |
| Lindstädt, R. – J. B. Slapin – R. J. Vander Wielen. 2011. Balancing Competing Demands: Position Taking and Election Proximity in the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, r. 36, č. 1, s. 37–70. |
| Linek, L. – Z. Mansfeldová. 2007. The Parliament of the Czech Republic, 1993–2004. The Journal of Legislative Studies, r. 13, č. 1, s. 12–37. |
| Lupia, A. – K. Strøm. 1995. Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Legislative Elections. American Political Science Review, r. 89, č. 3, s. 648–665. |
| Lyons, P. – T. Lacina. 2009. An Examination of Legislative Roll-Call Voting in the Czech Republic Using Spatial Models. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, r. 45, č. 6, s. 1155–1190. |
| Mair, P. 2008. The Challenge to Party Government. West European Politics, r. 31, č. 1–2, s. 211–234. |
| Mair, P. 2013. Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso. |
| Mandelbaum, A. G. 2011. Strengthening Parliamentary Accountability, Citizen Engagement and Access to Information: A Global Survey of Parliamentary Monitoring Organizations. National Democratic Institute and World Bank Institute [online]. Dostupné z https://www.ndi.org/files/governance-parliamentary-monitoring-organizations-survey-september-2011.pdf. Ověřeno 24. 4. 2016. |
| Mansfeldová, Z. 2005. Executive-Legislative Relations in the Budgeting Process in the Czech Republic. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, r. 41, č. 3, s. 443–460. |
| Maravall, J. M. 1999. Accountability and Manipulation. In Przeworski, A. – S. C. Stokes – B. Manin (Eds.). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 154–196. |
| Maravall, J. M. 2007. The Political Consequences of Internal Party Democracy. In Maravall, J. M. – I. Sánchez-Cuenca. Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions, and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 167–201. |
| McGann, A. J. 2006. The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press. |
| Mezey, M. L. 1994. New Perspectives on Parliamentary Systems: A Review Article. Legislative Studies Quarterly, r. 19, č. 3, s. 429–441. |
| Morgenstern, S. 2004. Patters of Legislative Politics. Roll-Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Moury, C. – M. Ferguson. 2013. Germany. In Moury, C. Coalition Government and Party Mandate. How Coalition Agreements Constrain Ministerial Action. New York: Routledge, s. 32–53. |
| Müller, W. C. – F. Fallend. 2004. Changing Patterns of Party Competition in Austria: From Multipolar to Bipolar System. West European Politics, r. 27, č. 5, s. 801–835. |
| Munck, G. L. 2009. Measuring Democracy. A Bridge Between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. |
| Novák, M. 1997. Systémy politických stran. Úvod do jejich srovnávacího studia. Praha: SLON – Sociologické nakladatelství. |
| Novák, M. 2001. Jakou demokracii pro nové demokracie? Konsensuální model, efektivita a kulturně homogenní země. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
| NR SR. 2015. Slovník parlamentných pojmov [online]. Dostupné z http://www.nrsr.sk/web/?sid=slovnik. Ověřeno 30. 9. 2015. |
| Nurmi, H. 1997. The Representation of Voter Groups in the European Parliament: A Penrose-Banzhaf Index Analysis. Electoral Studies, r. 16, č. 3, s. 317–327. |
| O’Donnell, G. 1991. Delegative Democracy? Working paper for the East-South System Transformations project. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. |
| Ozbudun, E. 1970. Party Cohesion in Western Democracies: A Casual Analysis. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications. |
| Pajala, A. 2013. Government vs Opposition Voting in the Finnish Parliament Suomen Eduskunta since World War II. European Journal of Government and Economics, r. 2, č. 1, s. 42–58. |
| Paloheimo, H. 2001. Divided Government in Finland: From a Semi-Presidential to a Parliamentary Democracy. In Elgie, R. (Ed.). Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 86–105. |
| Paskalev, V. 2002. Institutionalization of Parliamentary Control over the Administration. The House of Commons Select Commities in Comparative Perspective. LLM Thesis. Budapest: Central European University [online]. Dostupné z http://www.academia.edu/779351/institutionalization_of_parliamentary_control_over_the_administration. Ověřeno 13. 2. 2014. |
| Pitkin, H. F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press. |
| Poole, K. T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Powell, G. B. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. |
| Powell, G. B. 2013. Electoral Responsiveness, Party Government, and the Imperfect Performance of Democratic Elections. In Müller, W. C. – H. M. Narud (Eds.). Party Governance and Party Democracy. Festschrift to Kaare Strom. New York: Springer, s. 81–97. |
| Powell, G. B. – G. D. Withen. 1993. A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science, r. 37, č. 2, s. 391–414. |
| Prata, A. 2006. Government Domination, Consensus or Chaos? A Study of Party Discipline and Agenda Control in National Legislatures. Disertační práce. University of California, San Diego [online]. Dostupné z http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8db7g012. Ověřeno 24. 4. 2016. |
| Przeworski, A. – S. C. Stokes – B. Manin. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Radaelli, C. M. et al. 2012. Recasting Institutionalism: Institutional Analysis and Public Policy. European Political Science, r. 11, č. 4, s. 537–550. |
| Rasch, B. E. 1999. Electoral Systems, Parliamentary Committees, and Party Discipline: The Norwegian Storting in a Comparative Perspective. In Bowler, S. – D. M. Farrell – R. S. Katz (Eds.). Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, s. 121–140. |
| Rasch, B. E. – G. Tsebelis. 2011. The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. London: Routledge. |
| Rehfeld, A. 2009. Representation Rethought. On Trustees, Delegates and Gyroscopes in the Study of Respresentation and Democracy. American Political Science Review, r. 103, č. 2, s. 214–230. |
| Rice, S. A. 1925. The Behavior of Legislative Groups: A Method of Measurement. Political Science Quarterly, r. 40, č. 1, s. 60–72. |
| Riker, W. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review, r. 74, č. 2, s. 432–446. |
| Ryan, A. 2004. Problems and Methods in Political Science: Rational Explanation and its Limits. In Shapiro, I. – R. M. Smith – T. E. Masoud (Eds.). Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 186–200. |
| Saalfeld, T. 1995. Parteisoldaten und Rebellen. Fraktionen im Deutschen Bundestag 1949–1990. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. |
| Saalfeld, T. 2003. Germany: Stable Parties, Chancellor Democracy, and the Art of Informal Settlement. In Müller, W. C. – K. Strøm (Eds.). Coalitions Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 32–82. |
| Saiegh, S. M. 2004. Government Defeat: Coalitions, Responsiveness, and Legislative Success. Disertační práce. New York University. |
| Samuels, D. J. – M. S. Shugart. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers. How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| Sartori, G. 1971. Opposition and Control: Problems and Prospects. In Barker, R. (Ed.). Studies in Opposition. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, s. 31–38. |
| Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Sartori, G. 2001. Srovnávací ústavní inženýrství. Zkoumání struktur, podnětů a výsledků. Praha: SLON – Sociologické nakladatelství. |
| Shugart, M. S. 1998. The Inverse Relationship between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politician’s Constitutional Choices. British Journal of Political Science, r. 28, č. 1, s. 1–29. |
| Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. American Government in Action Series. New York: Farrar & Rinehart. |
| Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row. |
| Schwarz, D. 2005. How Representative are Published Votes for Legislative Voting Behaviour? Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Budapest [online]. Dostupné z https://biblio.parlament.ch/e-docs/140998.pdf. Ověřeno 24. 4. 2016. |
| Schweiger, Ch. 2010. Towards Institutional Gridlock? The Limitations of Germany’s Consensus Democracy. German Policy Studies, r. 6, č. 1, s. 3–42. |
| Siaroff, A. 2000. Comparative European Party Systems. An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections since 1945. New York – London: Garland Publishing. |
| Sieberer, U. 2006. Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies, r. 12, č. 2, s. 150–178. |
| Skjæveland, A. 1999. A Danish Party Cohesion Cycle. Scandinavian Political Studies, r. 22, č. 2, s. 121–136. |
| Stecker, Ch. 2015. How Effects on Party Unity Vary across Votes. Party Politics, r. 21, č. 5, s. 791–802. |
| Stokes, S. C. 1999. What do Policy Switches Tell Us about Democracy? In Przeworski, A. – S. C. Stokes – B. Manin. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 98–130. |
| Strøm, K. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Strøm, K. 1995. Parliamentary Government and Legislative Organisation. In Döring, H. (Ed.). Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Potsdam: Campus Verlag – St. Martin’s Press, s. 51–82. |
| Traber, D. – S. Hug – P. Sciarini. 2013. Party Unity in the Swiss Parliament: The Electoral Connection. The Journal of Legislative Studies, r. 20, č. 2, s. 193–215. |
| Tsebelis, G. 1990. Nested Games. Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press. |
| Tsebelis, G. 1995. Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies. In Döring, H. (Ed.). Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Potsdam: Campus Verlag – St. Martin’s Press, s. 83–111. |
| Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press & Russell Sage Foundation. |
| Vatter, A. 2009. Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries? European Political Science Review, r. 1, č. 1, s. 125–154. |
| von Beyme, K. 2000. Parliamentary Democracy. Democratization, Destabilization, Reconsolidation, 1789–1999. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. |
| Ware, A. 1995. The Party Systems of the Established Liberal Democracties in the 1990s: Is this a Decade of Transformation? Government and Opposition, r. 30, č. 3, s. 312–326. |
| Warwick, P. 1992. Rising Hazards: An Underlying Dynamic of Parliamentary Government. American Journal of Political Science, r. 36, č. 2, s. 857–876. |
| Warwick, P. 1994. Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Webb, P. – J. Fisher. 1999. The Changing British Party System: Two-Party Equilibrium or the Emergence of Moderate Pluralism? In Broughton, D. – M. Donovan (Eds.). Changing Party Systems in Western Europe. London, New York: Pinter, s. 8–29. |
| Webb, P. 2000. The Modern British Party System. London: Sage. |
| Wiberg, M. 1995. Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication? In Döring, H. (Ed.). Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Potsdam: Campus Verlag – St. Martin’s Press, s. 179–222. |
| Wintr, J. 2010. Česká parlamentní kultura. Praha: Auditorium. |
| Zulianello, M. 2014. Analyzing Party Competition Through the Comparativemanifesto Data: Some Theoretical and Methodologicalconsiderations. Quality & Quantity. International Journal of Methodology, r. 48, č. 3, s. 1723–1737. |