The Least Accountable Branch

J 2013

The Least Accountable Branch

KOSAŘ, David

Základní údaje

Originální název

The Least Accountable Branch

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

International Journal of Constitutional Law, New York, Oxford University Press, 2013, 1474-2640

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50500 5.5 Law

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.568

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/13:00067499

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056

UT WoS

000320859900014

Klíčová slova anglicky

judges; judicial accountability; judicial independence; rule of law; transitional justice; court presidents

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 4. 2014 12:20, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This article analyzes the concept of judicial accountability. It builds on three recent books (“Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary” edited by Guy Canivet, Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve; “Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law” by Hakeem Yusuf; and “Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe: From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice” by Daniela Piana) that deal with judicial accountability and suggests avenues for further research. In section 1, I briefly summarize the content and key arguments of the three recent books on judicial accountability. Section 2 focuses on the relationship between judicial accountability and the concept of accountability. Section 3 deals with the three key questions of judicial accountability: accountability of whom, to whom, and for what. Section 4 is devoted to the role of cultural factors in holding judges to account. Section 5 looks at various approaches to reckoning with the past within the judiciary and how these approaches affect post-authoritarian and post-totalitarian societies that are in the process of transition to democracy. Section 6 briefly examines the widely disputed relationship between judicial accountability and judicial independence. Section 7 identifies avenues for further research and section 8 concludes.

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David. The Least Accountable Branch. International Journal of Constitutional Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, roč. 11, č. 1, s. 234-260. ISSN 1474-2640. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056.

@article{1070292,
   author = {Kosař, David},
   article_location = {New York},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056},
   keywords = {judges; judicial accountability; judicial independence; rule of law; transitional justice; court presidents},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1474-2640},
   journal = {International Journal of Constitutional Law},
   title = {The Least Accountable Branch},
   volume = {11},
   year = {2013}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1070292
AU  - Kosař, David
PY  - 2013
TI  - The Least Accountable Branch
JF  - International Journal of Constitutional Law
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
SP  - 234-260
EP  - 234-260
PB  - Oxford University Press
SN  - 14742640
KW  - judges
KW  - judicial accountability
KW  - judicial independence
KW  - rule of law
KW  - transitional justice
KW  - court presidents
N2  - This article analyzes the concept of judicial accountability. It builds on three recent books (“Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary” edited by Guy Canivet, Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve; “Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law” by Hakeem Yusuf; and “Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe: From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice” by Daniela Piana) that deal with judicial accountability and suggests avenues for further research. In section 1, I briefly summarize the content and key arguments of the three recent books on judicial accountability. Section 2 focuses on the relationship between judicial accountability and the concept of accountability. Section 3 deals with the three key questions of judicial accountability: accountability of whom, to whom, and for what. Section 4 is devoted to the role of cultural factors in holding judges to account. Section 5 looks at various approaches to reckoning with the past within the judiciary and how these approaches affect post-authoritarian and post-totalitarian societies that are in the process of transition to democracy. Section 6 briefly examines the widely disputed relationship between judicial accountability and judicial independence. Section 7 identifies avenues for further research and section 8 concludes.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David. The Least Accountable Branch. \textit{International Journal of Constitutional Law}. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, roč.~11, č.~1, s.~234-260. ISSN~1474-2640. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci