MYŠKA, Matěj, Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ, Jaromír ŠAVELKA and Martin ŠKOP. Creative Commons and Grand Challenge to Make Legal Language Simple. In Monica Palmirani, Ugo Pagallo, Pompeu Casanovas, Giovanni Sartor. AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 2012, p. 271-285. ISBN 978-3-642-35730-5.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Creative Commons and Grand Challenge to Make Legal Language Simple
Authors MYŠKA, Matěj (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jaromír ŠAVELKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Martin ŠKOP (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents, p. 271-285, 15 pp. 2012.
Publisher Springer
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 50501 Law
Country of publisher Germany
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/12:00062135
Organization unit Faculty of Law
ISBN 978-3-642-35730-5
Keywords in English legal language simplification certainty copyright Creative Commons
Tags rivok
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 9/9/2020 14:47.
Abstract
In this paper we analyse the Creative Commons computerized licensing system. We draw the attention to the fact that despite considerable efforts to make the complicated task of licensing work using so-called free license as simple as possible, the system is apt to give rise to countless ambiguities often leading to copyright infringements. We maintain that the phenomenon has been caused by the modifications of ‘language’ that facilitates the communication of the relevant section of law and consequent loss of vital context and structure in the framework of which the communication has to be perceived. We come to a conclusion that while context and structure preserving modifications should be regarded as the preferable method of simplifying legal language, its scope is too narrow to achieve the goal of making legal language easily understandable for a layperson. Unconstrained simplification is powerful enough to achieve the goal but entails a danger of driving a layperson, as well as a professional, into undesirable outcomes.
PrintDisplayed: 27/5/2024 00:09