Detailed Information on Publication Record
2013
The effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension in relation to baseline blood pressure and secondary causes of hypertension
VACLAVIK, Jan, Richard SEDLAK, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ, Eva KOCIANOVA, Milos TABORSKY et. al.Basic information
Original name
The effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension in relation to baseline blood pressure and secondary causes of hypertension
Authors
VACLAVIK, Jan (203 Czech Republic), Richard SEDLAK (203 Czech Republic), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Eva KOCIANOVA (203 Czech Republic) and Milos TABORSKY (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University, Olomouc, Palacky University, 2013, 1213-8118
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.661
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/13:00072692
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000316989100009
Keywords in English
resistant hypertension; spironolactone; clinical trials; blood pressure; secondary hypertension
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 19/3/2014 11:27, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Abstract
V originále
Aims. There are currently limited data about whether the effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension depends on baseline blood pressure and the presence of a secondary cause of hypertension. Methods. Patients with office systolic blood pressure (BP) > 140 mmHg or diastolic BP > 90 mmHg, despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or a placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (ASPIRANT). Results. Analyses were done with 55 patients treated with spironolactone. The degree of BP reduction after 8 weeks of spironolactone treatment did not differ significantly between the three tertiles of baseline systolic BP and patients with and without a secondary cause of hypertension. The reduction of office systolic, office diastolic BP and office pulse pressure was significantly lower in the highest tertile with baseline diastolic BP > 97 mmHg. Conclusions. Spironolactone treatment is effective to a similar extent both in patients with and without a secondary cause of hypertension and regardless of the baseline value of systolic BP. Less effect of spironolactone was found in patients with the highest baseline diastolic BP.