J 2014

A cross-cultural study on freshmens knowledge of genetics, evolution, and the nature of science

SORGO, Andrej, Muhammet USAK, Milan KUBIATKO, Jana FANČOVIČOVÁ, Pavol PROKOP et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

A cross-cultural study on freshmens knowledge of genetics, evolution, and the nature of science

Autoři

SORGO, Andrej (705 Slovinsko), Muhammet USAK (792 Turecko), Milan KUBIATKO (703 Slovensko, garant, domácí), Jana FANČOVIČOVÁ (703 Slovensko), Pavol PROKOP (703 Slovensko), Miro PUHEK (705 Slovinsko), Jiří SKODA (203 Česká republika) a Mehmet BAHAR (792 Turecko)

Vydání

Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2014, 1822-7864

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50300 5.3 Education

Stát vydavatele

Litva

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14410/14:00075413

Organizační jednotka

Pedagogická fakulta

UT WoS

000334107400002

Klíčová slova anglicky

evolution; genetics; human evolution; nature of science; non-scientific explanations

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 13. 9. 2015 18:15, PaedDr. Milan Kubiatko, PhD.

Anotace

V originále

The purpose of this study was to measure the freshmens level of knowledge about genetics, evolution, human evolution, the nature of science, and opinions on evolution and the presence of non-scientific explanations among Czech, Slovakian, Slovenian and Turkish students. Determination of prior knowledge and pre-conceptions about these issues is important because they are filters to learning other related concepts. The results are going to be a starting point for developing teaching strategies concerning Darwinian evolution and preparing prospective science teachers for working with students in national and international contexts. A total of 994 first-year university students from the Czech Republic (276; 27.8%), Slovakia (212, 21.3%), Slovenia (217, 27.3%) and Turkey (235, 23.6%) participated in this study. The findings can be summarized as follows: knowledge especially that of the nature of science at the freshmen level was seriously flawed. Non-scientific explanations were present in high percentages. Both were regarded as barriers towards scientific reasoning and acceptance of general human evolution especially for students expressing orthodox religious beliefs.