Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the
agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era

k 2013

Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era

ORSILLO, Nicholas Paul

Základní údaje

Originální název

Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era

Název česky

Ochrana krajiny lidu? Česká ochrana přírody a zemědělské krajiny po v poválečné době

Název anglicky

Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era

Autoři

ORSILLO, Nicholas Paul

Vydání

Seventh Biennial Conference of the European Society for Environmental History, Munich Germany, 2013

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Klíčová slova česky

ochrana přírody, Československo, kolektivizace zemědělství, environmentální dějiny

Klíčová slova anglicky

nature conservation, Czechoslovakia, agricultural collectivization, environmental history

Změněno: 26. 5. 2014 15:16, Mgr. Nicholas Paul Orsillo

Anotace

V originále

The Czech rural landscape underwent massive changes in the second half of the 20th century as a result of 40 years of collectivized agricultural production based on centralized state planning. During this period intensive agricultural practices had a detrimental environmental impact on the land resulting in an overall reduction in ecological stability: landscape structure was simplified, overall landscape biodiversity decreased, field size, and erosion and pesticide and fertilizer use increased significantly. Collectivization began in earnest in 1948 and officially ended in 1960. Although increasing agricultural production was a declared goal, collectivization was mainly a political process aimed at ensuring Communist control of the countryside. In the public perception today this period is most noted for its emphasis on consolidating previously privately owned fields into larger parcels of farm land. In order to do so unploughed field boundaries were ploughed, a symbolic act that not only signified the end of private property in the countryside, but also environmental damage to follow, as these boundaries provided landscape biodiversity and prevented erosion. This is certainly the most well-known environmental aspect of collectivization. However, there were others that were arguably positive. State ownership of land opened up new possibilities for conservation, as old disputes between private landowners and conservationists seemingly disappeared. In addition the Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature, which involved establishing shelterbelts as well as ponds and reservoirs in the landscape to increase agricultural production, was tentatively environmental in nature and was influential on Czech agricultural and environmental scientists at the time. Based on the study of period textbooks, journal articles and personal archival materials this paper analyses how the environmental impact of agricultural collectivization and the introduction of Soviet agriculture methods was perceived by nature conservationists, ecologists and scientists working in related fields. How scientists viewed the environmental impact of landscape changes, as well as the potential that the newly formed Communist system had for nature conservation will be addressed.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0764/2012, interní kód MU

Název: Ekologicky příznivé varianty životního způsobu: kořeny a současnost (Akronym: EVAR)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Ekologicky příznivé varianty životního způsobu: kořeny a současnost, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

ORSILLO, Nicholas Paul. Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era. In Seventh Biennial Conference of the European Society for Environmental History, Munich Germany. 2013.

@proceedings{1183826,
   author = {Orsillo, Nicholas Paul},
   booktitle = {Seventh Biennial Conference of the European Society for Environmental History, Munich Germany},
   keywords = {nature conservation, Czechoslovakia, agricultural collectivization, environmental history},
   title = {Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era},
   year = {2013}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1183826
AU  - Orsillo, Nicholas Paul
PY  - 2013
TI  - Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era
KW  - nature conservation, Czechoslovakia, agricultural collectivization, environmental history
N2  - The Czech rural landscape underwent massive changes in the second half of the 20th century as a result of 40 years of collectivized agricultural production based on centralized state planning. During this period intensive agricultural practices had a detrimental environmental impact on the land resulting in an overall reduction in ecological stability: landscape structure was simplified, overall landscape biodiversity decreased, field size, and erosion and pesticide and fertilizer use increased significantly. Collectivization began in earnest in 1948 and officially ended in 1960. Although increasing agricultural production was a declared goal, collectivization was mainly a political process aimed at ensuring Communist control of the countryside. In the public perception today this period is most noted for its emphasis on consolidating previously privately owned fields into larger parcels of farm land. In order to do so unploughed field boundaries were ploughed, a symbolic act that not only signified the end of private property in the countryside, but also environmental damage to follow, as these boundaries provided landscape biodiversity and prevented erosion. This is certainly the most well-known environmental aspect of collectivization. However, there were others that were arguably positive. State ownership of land opened up new possibilities for conservation, as old disputes between private landowners and conservationists seemingly disappeared. In addition the Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature, which involved establishing shelterbelts as well as ponds and reservoirs in the landscape to increase agricultural production, was tentatively environmental in nature and was influential on Czech agricultural and environmental scientists at the time. Based on the study of period textbooks, journal articles and personal archival materials this paper analyses how the environmental impact of agricultural collectivization and the introduction of Soviet agriculture methods was perceived by nature conservationists, ecologists and scientists working in related fields. How scientists viewed the environmental impact of landscape changes, as well as the potential that the newly formed Communist system had for nature conservation will be addressed.
ER  -

ORSILLO, Nicholas Paul. Conserving the people’s land? Czech nature protection and the agricultural landscape in the post-World War II era. In \textit{Seventh Biennial Conference of the European Society for Environmental History, Munich Germany}. 2013.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci