Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative
Bodies in the Czech Republic

J 2014

Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative Bodies in the Czech Republic

SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL a David HEJČ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative Bodies in the Czech Republic

Název česky

Rozklad proti rozhodnutím vydaným ústředními správními orgány v České republice

Autoři

SKULOVÁ, Soňa (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Lukáš POTĚŠIL (203 Česká republika, domácí) a David HEJČ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

International Public Administration Review, Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, 2014, 2335-3414

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50500 5.5 Law

Stát vydavatele

Slovinsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/14:00073688

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

remonstrance; appeal; administrative procedure; central administrative authority; legality; effectiveness

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 12. 3. 2015 15:51, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The remonstrance is traditional standard (ordinary) remedial measure which can be (only) applied after the first instance decision has been issued by central administrative body. The article is heading to verify the hypothesis whether the remonstrance does reflect the principle of two instances in entirety. As the finding of the research it can be pointed out that the remonstrance represents relative exclusion of the principle of two instances, which is applied only in a modified form, as the remonstrance is not decided by any higher, independent administrative authority, but by the identical central administrative body, namely by its head, not by its remonstrance committee, which issues “only” recommendations/advices. We concluded that possible solutions are either transformation remonstrance committees into administrative bodies/tribunals, or rules providing the central administrative bodies do not make first instance decisions.

Návaznosti

GA13-30730S, projekt VaV

Název: Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv ve veřejné správě, jejich systém a efektivnost

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv ve veřejné správě, jejich systém a efektivnost

Citovat

SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL a David HEJČ. Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative Bodies in the Czech Republic. International Public Administration Review. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, 2014, roč. 12, 2-3, s. 123-142. ISSN 2335-3414.

@article{1185723,
   author = {Skulová, Soňa and Potěšil, Lukáš and Hejč, David},
   article_location = {Ljubljana},
   article_number = {2-3},
   keywords = {remonstrance; appeal; administrative procedure; central administrative authority; legality; effectiveness},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2335-3414},
   journal = {International Public Administration Review},
   title = {Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative Bodies in the Czech Republic},
   url = {http://www.fu.uni-lj.si/en/publishing-center/international-public-administration-review/current-issue/},
   volume = {12},
   year = {2014}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1185723
AU  - Skulová, Soňa - Potěšil, Lukáš - Hejč, David
PY  - 2014
TI  - Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative Bodies in the Czech Republic
JF  - International Public Administration Review
VL  - 12
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 123-142
EP  - 123-142
PB  - University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration
SN  - 23353414
KW  - remonstrance
KW  - appeal
KW  - administrative procedure
KW  - central administrative authority
KW  - legality
KW  - effectiveness
UR  - http://www.fu.uni-lj.si/en/publishing-center/international-public-administration-review/current-issue/
L2  - http://www.fu.uni-lj.si/en/publishing-center/international-public-administration-review/current-issue/
N2  - The remonstrance is traditional standard (ordinary) remedial measure which can be (only) applied after the first instance decision has been issued by central administrative body. The article is heading to verify the hypothesis whether the remonstrance does reflect the principle of two instances in entirety. As the finding of the research it can be pointed out that the remonstrance represents relative exclusion of the principle of two instances, which is applied only in a modified form, as the remonstrance is not decided by any higher, independent administrative authority, but by the identical central administrative body, namely by its head, not by its remonstrance committee, which issues “only” recommendations/advices. We concluded that possible solutions are either transformation remonstrance committees into administrative bodies/tribunals, or rules providing the central administrative bodies do not make first instance decisions.
ER  -

SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL a David HEJČ. Remonstrance Against Decisions Made by Central Administrative Bodies in the Czech Republic. \textit{International Public Administration Review}. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, 2014, roč.~12, 2-3, s.~123-142. ISSN~2335-3414.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci