SARIS, Daniel, Andrew PRICE, Wojciech WIDUCHOWSKI, Marion BERTRAND-MARCHAND, Jacob CARON, Jon Olav DROGSET, Pieter EMANS, Ales PODSKUBKA, Anika TSUCHIDA, Sven KILI, David LEVINE, Mats BRITTBERG, Libor PAŠA, Tomas TRC, Konrad SLYNARSKI, Bernd-Jan SANSON a Mauritz BEZUIDENHOUDT. Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture Two-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. Chicago: Thomson Reuters, 2014, roč. 42, č. 6, s. 1384-1394. ISSN 0363-5465. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546514528093.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture Two-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial
Název česky MACI autologní kultivované chondrocytry versus microfrature - dvouleté výsleky prospektivní randomizoévané studie
Autoři SARIS, Daniel (528 Nizozemské království), Andrew PRICE (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko), Wojciech WIDUCHOWSKI (616 Polsko), Marion BERTRAND-MARCHAND (250 Francie), Jacob CARON (528 Nizozemské království), Jon Olav DROGSET (578 Norsko), Pieter EMANS (528 Nizozemské království), Ales PODSKUBKA (203 Česká republika), Anika TSUCHIDA (528 Nizozemské království), Sven KILI (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko), David LEVINE (840 Spojené státy), Mats BRITTBERG (752 Švédsko), Libor PAŠA (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Tomas TRC (203 Česká republika), Konrad SLYNARSKI (616 Polsko), Bernd-Jan SANSON (528 Nizozemské království) a Mauritz BEZUIDENHOUDT (528 Nizozemské království).
Vydání The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Chicago, Thomson Reuters, 2014, 0363-5465.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30211 Orthopaedics
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 4.362
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/14:00077193
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546514528093
UT WoS 000340721400023
Klíčová slova česky chrupavka; autologní transplantace na nosiči microfracture
Klíčová slova anglicky cartilage repair; clinical outcomes; knee; matrix-applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes (MACI) implant; microfracture
Štítky EL OK
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Změněno: 8. 1. 2015 12:58.
Anotace
Background: Randomized controlled trials studying the efficacy and safety of matrix-applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes (MACI) versus microfracture (MFX) for treating cartilage defects are limited. Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of MACI versus MFX in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients enrolled in the SUMMIT (Demonstrate the Superiority of MACI implant to Microfracture Treatment) trial had >= 1 symptomatic focal cartilage defect (Outerbridge grade III or IV; >= 3 cm(2)) of the femoral condyles or trochlea, with a baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain value <55. The co-primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the KOOS pain and function subscores from baseline to 2 years. Histological evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments of structural repair tissue, treatment failure, the remaining 3 KOOS subscales, and safety were also assessed. Results: Of the 144 patients treated, 137 (95%) completed the 2-year assessment. Patients had a mean age of 33.8 years and a mean lesion size of 4.8 cm(2). The mean KOOS pain and function subscores from baseline to 2 years were significantly more improved with MACI than with MFX (pain: MACI, 37.0 to 82.5 vs MFX, 35.5 to 70.9; function: MACI, 14.9 to 60.9 vs MFX, 12.6 to 48.7; P = .001). A significant improvement in scores was also observed on the KOOS subscales of activities of daily living (MACI, 43.5 to 87.2 vs MFX, 42.6 to 75.8; P < .001), knee-related quality of life (MACI, 18.8 to 56.2 vs MFX, 17.2 to 47.3; P = .029), and other symptoms (MACI, 48.3 to 83.7 vs MFX, 44.4 to 72.2; P < .001) for patients treated with MACI compared with MFX. Repair tissue quality was good as assessed by histology/MRI, but no difference was shown between treatments. A low number of treatment failures (nonresponders: MACI, 12.5% vs MFX, 31.9%; P = .016) and no unexpected safety findings were reported. Conclusion: The treatment of symptomatic cartilage knee defects >= 3 cm(2) in size using MACI was clinically and statistically significantly better than with MFX, with similar structural repair tissue and safety, in this heterogeneous patient population. Moreover, MACI offers a more efficacious alternative than MFX with a similar safety profile for the treatment of symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the knee.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 21. 7. 2024 15:31