The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics

C 2018

The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics

KOSAŘ, David

Základní údaje

Originální název

The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Cambridge, International Courts and Domestic Politics, od s. 71-92, 22 s. 2018

Nakladatel

Cambridge University Press

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50501 Law

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/18:00101915

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-1-108-42776-0

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108590396.005

Klíčová slova anglicky

European Court of Human Rights; judicial design; court administration; judicial system

Štítky

rivok, topvydavatel

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 2. 5. 2019 13:19, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This chapter discusses to what extent and how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has engaged in domestic judicial design. It shows that the judgments of the Strasbourg Court, rather than having effects only with respect to the individual whose rights have been violated, has much deeper structural effects in the design and operation of domestic judicial systems. This chapter argues that this phenomenon goes rather unnoticed, but it has deep implications for both the developing and developed democracies. To demonstrate this phenomenon, the chapter assesses the impact of the ECtHR on three judicial design issues. First, it illustrates how the ECtHR has challenged the role of the advocates general. Second, it explains how the ECtHR has gradually curbed the jurisdiction of military courts over both civilians and military officers, which has brought these courts to the brink of their abolition. Finally, it outlines how the ECtHR in its judgments regarding the disciplining of judges empowers the judiciary at the expense of other political institutions within the State. Based on the analysis of these three judicial design issues, it concludes that the Strasbourg Court is affecting the internal architecture of domestic judiciaries as it gradually endorses the unification of court administration and changes the power structures within the judiciary. Interestingly, neither the established democracies nor the developing countries have shown significant resistance to these far-reaching requirements that impinge upon the cornerstones of domestic judicial systems. This chapter proposes possible explanations of why this is so and identifies avenues for further research.

Přiložené soubory

20190605141415112.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David. The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics. In Marlene Wind. International Courts and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, s. 71-92. ISBN 978-1-108-42776-0. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108590396.005.

@inbook{1228424,
   author = {Kosař, David},
   address = {Cambridge},
   booktitle = {International Courts and Domestic Politics},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108590396.005},
   editor = {Marlene Wind},
   keywords = {European Court of Human Rights; judicial design; court administration; judicial system},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Cambridge},
   isbn = {978-1-108-42776-0},
   pages = {71-92},
   publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   title = {The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1228424
AU  - Kosař, David
PY  - 2018
TI  - The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics
VL  - Neuveden
PB  - Cambridge University Press
CY  - Cambridge
SN  - 9781108427760
KW  - European Court of Human Rights
KW  - judicial design
KW  - court administration
KW  - judicial system
N2  - This chapter discusses to what extent and how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has engaged in domestic judicial design. It shows that the judgments of the Strasbourg Court, rather than having effects only with respect to the individual whose rights have been violated, has much deeper structural effects in the design and operation of domestic judicial systems. This chapter argues that this phenomenon goes rather unnoticed, but it has deep implications for both the developing and developed democracies. To demonstrate this phenomenon, the chapter assesses the impact of the ECtHR on three judicial design issues. First, it illustrates how the ECtHR has challenged the role of the advocates general. Second, it explains how the ECtHR has gradually curbed the jurisdiction of military courts over both civilians and military officers, which has brought these courts to the brink of their abolition. Finally, it outlines how the ECtHR in its judgments regarding the disciplining of judges empowers the judiciary at the expense of other political institutions within the State. Based on the analysis of these three judicial design issues, it concludes that the Strasbourg Court is affecting the internal architecture of domestic judiciaries as it gradually endorses the unification of court administration and changes the power structures within the judiciary. Interestingly, neither the established democracies nor the developing countries have shown significant resistance to these far-reaching requirements that impinge upon the cornerstones of domestic judicial systems. This chapter proposes possible explanations of why this is so and identifies avenues for further research.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David. The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics. In Marlene Wind. \textit{International Courts and Domestic Politics}. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, s.~71-92. ISBN~978-1-108-42776-0. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108590396.005.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci