2015
Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the cerebrospinal fluid; biomarkers utilisable for differential diagnostics of bacterial and aseptic meningitis?
DASTYCH, Milan; Jana GOTTWALDOVÁ a Zdeňka ČERMÁKOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the cerebrospinal fluid; biomarkers utilisable for differential diagnostics of bacterial and aseptic meningitis?
Autoři
DASTYCH, Milan; Jana GOTTWALDOVÁ a Zdeňka ČERMÁKOVÁ
Vydání
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory medicine, BERLIN, WALTER DE GRUYTER & CO, 2015, 1434-6621
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.017
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/15:00082982
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
bacterial meningitis; calprotectin; cerebrospinal fluid; lactoferrin
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 27. 5. 2015 14:47, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Background: The aim of our work was to assess the diagnostic contribution of calprotectin and lactoferrin determinations in the cerebrospinal fluid when distinguishing between bacterial and aseptic meningitides. Methods: In 23 patients with bacterial meningitis (BM) and in 50 patients with aseptic meningitis (AM), we determined the concentrations of calprotectin, lactoferrin and the conventional biomarkers like glucose, total protein, lactate and polynuclear count in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The discriminative power of the various parameters studied was determined by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, the positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and the negative likelihood ratio (-LR). Results: The diagnostic efficiency of calprotectin, lactoferrin, lactate, and polynuclear count when distinguishing between bacterial and aseptic meningitides, expressed by ROC curve parameters, was as follows: AUC (0.736, 0.946, 0.932, 0.932), sensitivity (86.2, 96.6, 90.0, 89.7), specificity (58.5, 92.4, 87.0, 90.6), +LR (2.08, 12.8, 6.9, 9.50), -LR (0.24, 0.04, 0.11, 0.11), respectively. The optimal cut point for calprotectin and lactoferrin was 191 ng/mL and 17.8 ng/mL, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings show, that the determination of lactoferrin in the CSF was diagnostically the most efficient marker in distinguishing between bacterial and viral meningitides. Calprotectin was far less efficient diagnostic marker. The polynuclear count and lactate concentration showed a very good diagnostic efficiency as well. The determination of protein and glucose was diagnostically less beneficial.