2015
NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios
KŘÍŽ, ZdeněkZákladní údaje
Originální název
NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios
Název česky
NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios
Autoři
KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
1. vyd. Warsaw - Prague - Brussels, NEWCOMERS NO MORE? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of “Post-Cold War” Members, od s. 117-130, 14 s. NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION, 2015
Nakladatel
International Relations Research Institute in Warsaw
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Belgie
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
elektronická verze "online"
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/15:00084149
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
ISBN
978-83-62784-04-2
Klíčová slova česky
NATO; rozšiřování; obavy; realita
Klíčová slova anglicky
NATO; enlargement; fears; reality
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 2. 5. 2016 16:23, Ing. Alena Raisová
V originále
Despite the strong criticism against the NATO enlargement policy, we can conclude that the enlargement has not caused any significant damage to the Alliance. NATO’s internal cohesion did not suffer a great loss, as seeking a consensus between members is just as difficult as it was in the Cold War period. The dividing lines between members on controversial issues are not drawn on the grounds of the length of membership. Moreover, no new iron curtains have been dropped, as the “new” member states further support the NATO “open door” policy. Last but not least, almost all NATO members, not only “the newcomers”, should increase their military expenditures. The only exception is an obvious deterioration of relations with Russia, which occurred after Russia had launched the war with Georgia in 2008, and especially when it annexed Crimea and started a “hybrid war” against Ukraine in 2014.
Česky
Despite the strong criticism against the NATO enlargement policy, we can conclude that the enlargement has not caused any significant damage to the Alliance. NATO’s internal cohesion did not suffer a great loss, as seeking a consensus between members is just as difficult as it was in the Cold War period. The dividing lines between members on controversial issues are not drawn on the grounds of the length of membership. Moreover, no new iron curtains have been dropped, as the “new” member states further support the NATO “open door” policy. Last but not least, almost all NATO members, not only “the newcomers”, should increase their military expenditures. The only exception is an obvious deterioration of relations with Russia, which occurred after Russia had launched the war with Georgia in 2008, and especially when it annexed Crimea and started a “hybrid war” against Ukraine in 2014.