ZÁVADA, Jakub, Michal UHER, Radka SVOBODOVÁ, Marta OLEJÁROVÁ, Markéta HUŠÁKOVÁ, Hana CIFERSKÁ, Hana HULEJOVÁ, Michal TOMČÍK, Ladislav ŠENOLT and Jiří VENCOVSKÝ. Serum tenascin-C discriminates patients with active SLE from inactive patients and healthy controls and predicts the need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy: a cohort study. Arthritis Research & Therapy. London: BioMed Central, 2015, vol. 17, No 341, p. 1-11. ISSN 1478-6354. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0862-4.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Serum tenascin-C discriminates patients with active SLE from inactive patients and healthy controls and predicts the need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy: a cohort study
Authors ZÁVADA, Jakub (203 Czech Republic), Michal UHER (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Radka SVOBODOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Marta OLEJÁROVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Markéta HUŠÁKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Hana CIFERSKÁ (203 Czech Republic), Hana HULEJOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Michal TOMČÍK (203 Czech Republic), Ladislav ŠENOLT (203 Czech Republic) and Jiří VENCOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Arthritis Research & Therapy, London, BioMed Central, 2015, 1478-6354.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.979
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/15:00085323
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0862-4
UT WoS 000365253400002
Keywords in English Tenascin-C; Biomarker; SLE; Disease activity; Flare
Tags EL OK
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 18/12/2015 13:20.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine whether circulating levels of the proinflammatory glycoprotein tenascin-C (TNC) are useful as an activity-specific or predictive biomarker in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Serum TNC levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at inception visit in a prospective cohort of 59 SLE patients, and in 65 healthy controls (HC). SLE patients were followed for a mean of 11 months, disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group disease activity index (BILAG-2004), clinical and laboratory data were recorded every 3-6 months, and changes in glucocorticoids (GC) and immunosuppressants (IS) were recorded serially. We examined cross-sectionally the relationships between serum concentrations of TNC and SLE status, SLEDAI-2 K scores, strata of disease activity, and levels of conventional biomarkers [anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), anti-nucleosome antibodies, C3 and C4]. We also explored the utility of TNC levels for predicting disease flares, defined as (i) new/increased GC, (ii) new/increased GC or IS, and (iii) increase in SLEDAI by >= 3 or (iv) BILAG A or B flare. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean levels of TNC between the SLE patients and HC. However, in SLE patients with active disease (SLEDAI >= 6), the TNC levels were significantly higher than in the HC (p = 0.004) or in patients with no/low disease activity (p = 0.004). In SLE patients, TNC levels were significantly associated with positivity of anti-dsDNA (p = 0.03) and anti-nucleosome antibodies (p = 0.008). Flares defined by a need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy were captured more frequently and earlier than flares defined by standard activity indices. Higher baseline levels of serum TNC presented a significantly greater risk of flare (i) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.39, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.73] or (ii) (HR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.02-1.52) but not of flares (iii) or (iv). The baseline serum TNC level was the single most important independent predictor of flare (i) compared with conventional biomarkers. Conclusions: TNC is not disease-specific, but it seems to indicate the activity of SLE and may predict the need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy. TNC levels may thus serve as a useful activity-specific and predictive biomarker in SLE.
PrintDisplayed: 2/6/2024 15:44