2015
Libya and Criteria for Humanitarian Intervention
KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk a Kateřina FRIDRICHOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Libya and Criteria for Humanitarian Intervention
Název česky
Libye a kritéria pro humanitární intervenci
Autoři
Vydání
Politologický časopis, Brno, Masarykova univerzita, 2015, 1211-3247
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/15:00085941
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova česky
humanitární intervence; Libye; spravedlivá válka; RtoP; NATO
Klíčová slova anglicky
Humanitarian intervention; Libya; just war theory; RtoP; NATO
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 18. 2. 2019 09:34, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
V originále
When seeking guidelines for worst-case scenario, military intervention under the Responsibity to Protect looks to the just war tradition. We tried to pinpoint the most important criteria, drawing on the Responsibility to Protect report, subsequent RtoP development and relevant authors to create a background to which compare the NATO’s operation in Libya. These criteria were not met during the intervention, as is shown in this article. The criterion of just cause could be seen as fulfilled, albeit this admission is done very grudgingly – the loss of life was not that large comparing to other tragedies that did not trigger intervention. The Libyan intervention is most questionable when it comes to right intentions and proportional means that suggest that the goal of interveners was to topple the regime not protect the civilians. These results bring the discussion of the weakness of the RtoP approach when it comes to defining, which populations should be helped under this doctrine and whether the nature of victims should be taken into consideration.
Česky
When seeking guidelines for worst-case scenario, military intervention under the Responsibity to Protect looks to the just war tradition. We tried to pinpoint the most important criteria, drawing on the Responsibility to Protect report, subsequent RtoP development and relevant authors to create a background to which compare the NATO’s operation in Libya. These criteria were not met during the intervention, as is shown in this article. The criterion of just cause could be seen as fulfilled, albeit this admission is done very grudgingly – the loss of life was not that large comparing to other tragedies that did not trigger intervention. The Libyan intervention is most questionable when it comes to right intentions and proportional means that suggest that the goal of interveners was to topple the regime not protect the civilians. These results bring the discussion of the weakness of the RtoP approach when it comes to defining, which populations should be helped under this doctrine and whether the nature of victims should be taken into consideration.