2015
Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate
KOK, Madeleine, Casper MIHL, Anna SEEHOFNEROVÁ, Jakub TUREK, Gregor JOST et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate
Autoři
KOK, Madeleine (528 Nizozemské království), Casper MIHL (528 Nizozemské království), Anna SEEHOFNEROVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jakub TUREK (703 Slovensko, garant, domácí), Gregor JOST (276 Německo), Hubertus PIETSCH (276 Německo), Ulrike HABERLAND (276 Německo), Joachim E. WILDBERGER (528 Nizozemské království) a Marco DAS (528 Nizozemské království)
Vydání
American Journal of Roentgenology, Reston, American Roentgen Ray Society, 2015, 0361-803X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.660
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/15:00086075
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000365320400039
Klíčová slova anglicky
automated tube potential selection; contrast media; CT angiography; radiation exposure
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 20. 1. 2016 16:58, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Anotace
V originále
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate radiation dose reduction using automated tube voltage selection during CT angiography (CTA) and to evaluate the impact of contrast medium (CM) injection protocols on dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A circulation phantom containing the thoracic and abdominal vasculature was used. Four different concentrations of CM (iopromide 300 and 370 mg I/mL and iomeprol 350 and 400 mg I/mL) were administered while maintaining an identical iodine delivery rate (1.8 g I/s) and total iodine load (20.0 g). Three different scanning protocols for CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta were used: protocol A, no dose modulation; protocol B, automated tube current modulation (CARE Dose4D); and protocol C, automated tube voltage selection (CARE kV). The dose-length product was recorded to calculate the effective dose. Attenuation values (in Hounsfield units), image noise levels, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in six predefined intravascular sites (three thoracic and three abdominal) were measured by two readers. All values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS. There was a significant reduction in the effective dose (in millisieverts) for protocols B (mean +/- SD, 2.03 +/- 0.1 mSv) and C (1.00 +/- 0.0 mSv) compared with protocol A (4.34 +/- 0.0 mSv). The dose was reduced by 53% for protocol B and by 77% for protocol C. No significant differences were found in the effective dose among the different CM injection protocols within the scanning protocols; all p values were > 0.05. The attenuation values and SNRs were comparable among all the different CM injection protocols; all p values were > 0.05. CONCLUSION. A large radiation dose reduction (77%) can be achieved using automated tube voltage selection independent of the CM injection protocol.