2015
Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial
MOTZER, Robert J.; Thomas E. HUTSON; Hilary GLEN; M. Dror MICHAELSON; Ana MOLINA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial
Authors
MOTZER, Robert J. (840 United States of America); Thomas E. HUTSON (840 United States of America); Hilary GLEN (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland); M. Dror MICHAELSON (840 United States of America); Ana MOLINA (840 United States of America); Timothy EISEN (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland); Jacek JASSEM (616 Poland); Jakub ZOLNIEREK (616 Poland); Jose Pablo MAROTO (724 Spain); Begoña MELLADO (724 Spain); Bohuslav MELICHAR (203 Czech Republic); Jiří TOMÁŠEK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution); Alton KREMER (840 United States of America); Han-Joo KIM (840 United States of America); Karen WOOD (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland); Corina DUTCUS (840 United States of America) and James LARKIN (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
Edition
Lancet Oncology, New York, Elsevier Science INC, 2015, 1470-2045
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor
Impact factor: 26.509
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/15:00086819
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000364470900030
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-84955253186
Keywords in English
ANTITUMOR ACTIVITIES; INTERFERON-ALPHA; III TRIAL; BEVACIZUMAB; INHIBITOR; GROWTH; E7080; TEMSIROLIMUS; SORAFENIB; TARGETS
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 26/2/2016 13:16, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Abstract
In the original language
Background Currently, metastatic renal cell carcinoma is treated with sequential single agents targeting VEGF or mTOR. Here, we aimed to assess lenvatinib, everolimus, or their combination as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods We did a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial at 37 centres in five countries and enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic, clear-cell, renal cell carcinoma. We included patients who had received treatment with a VEGF-targeted therapy and progressed on or within 9 months of stopping that agent. Patients were randomised via an interactive voice response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to either lenvatinib (24 mg/day), everolimus (10 mg/day), or lenvatinib plus everolimus (18 mg/day and 5 mg/day, respectively) administered orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The randomisation procedure dynamically minimised imbalances between treatment groups for the stratification factors haemoglobin and corrected serum calcium. The primary objective was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is closed to enrolment but patients' treatment and follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01136733. Findings Between March 16, 2012, and June 19, 2013, 153 patients were randomly allocated to receive either the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus (n=51), single-agent lenvatinib (n=52), or single-agent everolimus (n=50). Lenvatinib plus everolimus significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with everolimus alone (median 14.6 months [95% CI 5.9-20.1] vs 5.5 months [3.5-7.1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.68; p=0.0005), but not compared with lenvatinib alone (7.4 months [95% CI 5.6-10.2]; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30-1.10; p=0.12). Single-agent lenvatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with everolimus alone (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.98; p=0.048). Grade 3 and 4 events occurred in fewer patients allocated single-agent everolimus (25 [50%]) compared with those assigned lenvatinib alone (41 [79%]) or lenvatinib plus everolimus (36 [71%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse event in patients allocated lenvatinib plus everolimus was diarrhoea (ten [20%]), in those assigned single-agent lenvatinib it was proteinuria (ten [19%]), and in those assigned single-agent everolimus it was anaemia (six [12%]). Two deaths were deemed related to study drug, one cerebral haemorrhage in the lenvatinib plus everolimus group and one myocardial infarction with single-agent lenvatinib. Interpretation Lenvatinib plus everolimus and lenvatinib alone resulted in a progression-free survival benefit for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed after one previous VEGF-targeted therapy. Further study of lenvatinib is warranted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.