Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties

k 2016

Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties

JANOVSKÝ, Jozef, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ a Hubert SMEKAL

Základní údaje

Originální název

Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties

Název česky

Porozumění přijímání mezinárodních lidskoprávních úmluv

Autoři

JANOVSKÝ, Jozef, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ a Hubert SMEKAL

Vydání

Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies Research Seminars, 2016

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

lidská práva; mezinárodní právo; smlouvy; závazky

Klíčová slova anglicky

human rights; international law; treaties; commitments

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

Změněno: 12. 3. 2016 18:44, Mgr. Hubert Smekal, Ph.D.

Anotace

ORIG CZ

V originále

With respect to the commitment patterns of various political regimes, we pose the following research questions: Do political regimes differ in their commitment activity depending on the substance of the treaty (i.e. relating to different areas of human rights protection, different generations of human rights – political rights, social rights, rights of minorities, etc.)? Do certain regimes commit faster to influential human rights declarations than to specific treaties regulating a particular human right and its procedural aspects? Does the commitment behaviour of different political regimes change with the strength of treaty’s control mechanism (and the potential threat of sanctions for noncompliance)? We will make a comparison across time and geographical space, making it possible to assess whether democratic and non-democratic states have been similar in their commitment patterns or not. We will pay special attention to the category of transitional regimes, comparing the practice of post-communist democracies from early 90s with the practice of other democratizing regimes both in the same time period and in different historical contexts.

Česky

Snažíme se identifikovat proměnné, které souvisejí s přijetím lidskoprávních závazků.

Návaznosti

GA13-27956S, projekt VaV

Název: Mezinárodní lidskoprávní závazky České republiky: trendy, praxe, příčiny a důsledky

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Mezinárodní lidskoprávní závazky České republiky: trendy, praxe, příčiny a důsledky

Citovat

JANOVSKÝ, Jozef, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ a Hubert SMEKAL. Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties. In Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies Research Seminars. 2016.

@proceedings{1338900,
   author = {Janovský, Jozef and Šipulová, Katarína and Smekal, Hubert},
   booktitle = {Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies Research Seminars},
   keywords = {human rights; international law; treaties; commitments},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties},
   url = {https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/events/understanding-adoption-international-human-rights-treaties-political-regimes-and-commitment},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1338900
AU  - Janovský, Jozef - Šipulová, Katarína - Smekal, Hubert
PY  - 2016
TI  - Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties
KW  - human rights
KW  - international law
KW  - treaties
KW  - commitments
UR  - https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/events/understanding-adoption-international-human-rights-treaties-political-regimes-and-commitment
N2  - With respect to the commitment patterns of various political regimes, we pose the following research questions: Do political regimes differ in their commitment activity depending on the substance of the treaty (i.e. relating to different areas of human rights protection, different generations of human rights – political rights, social rights, rights of minorities, etc.)? Do certain regimes commit faster to influential human rights declarations than to specific treaties regulating a particular human right and its procedural aspects? Does the commitment behaviour of different political regimes change with the strength of treaty’s control mechanism (and the potential threat of sanctions for noncompliance)? We will make a comparison across time and geographical space, making it possible to assess whether democratic and non-democratic states have been similar in their commitment patterns or not. We will pay special attention to the category of transitional regimes, comparing the practice of post-communist democracies from early 90s with the practice of other democratizing regimes both in the same time period and in different historical contexts.
ER  -

JANOVSKÝ, Jozef, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ a Hubert SMEKAL. Understanding Adoption of International Human Rights Treaties. In \textit{Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies Research Seminars}. 2016.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci