Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator
mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women
with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

J 2016

Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela, Martin HUSER, Atanas-Ivan BELKOV, Petr JANKŮ, Robert HUDEČEK et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

Autoři

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela (203 Česká republika, domácí), Martin HUSER (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Atanas-Ivan BELKOV (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr JANKŮ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Robert HUDEČEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr ŠTOURAČ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Pavel VENTRUBA (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

International urogynecology journal, London, Springer London, 2016, 0937-3462

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.937

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/16:00089792

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2

UT WoS

000374572900015

Klíčová slova anglicky

Stress urinary incontinence; Mid-urethral sling; Single-incision sling ; Efficacy; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial

Štítky

EL OK

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 29. 7. 2016 15:03, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient’s life quality.

Citovat

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela, Martin HUSER, Atanas-Ivan BELKOV, Petr JANKŮ, Robert HUDEČEK, Petr ŠTOURAČ, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ a Pavel VENTRUBA. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study. International urogynecology journal. London: Springer London, 2016, roč. 27, č. 5, s. 791-796. ISSN 0937-3462. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2.

@article{1343717,
   author = {Juráková, Michaela and Huser, Martin and Belkov, AtanasandIvan and Janků, Petr and Hudeček, Robert and Štourač, Petr and Jarkovský, Jiří and Ventruba, Pavel},
   article_location = {London},
   article_number = {5},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2},
   keywords = {Stress urinary incontinence; Mid-urethral sling; Single-incision sling ; Efficacy; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0937-3462},
   journal = {International urogynecology journal},
   title = {Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study},
   volume = {27},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1343717
AU  - Juráková, Michaela - Huser, Martin - Belkov, Atanas-Ivan - Janků, Petr - Hudeček, Robert - Štourač, Petr - Jarkovský, Jiří - Ventruba, Pavel
PY  - 2016
TI  - Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study
JF  - International urogynecology journal
VL  - 27
IS  - 5
SP  - 791-796
EP  - 791-796
PB  - Springer London
SN  - 09373462
KW  - Stress urinary incontinence
KW  - Mid-urethral sling
KW  - Single-incision sling
KW  - Efficacy
KW  - Patient-reported outcomes
KW  - Randomized controlled trial
N2  - Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient’s life quality.
ER  -

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela, Martin HUSER, Atanas-Ivan BELKOV, Petr JANKŮ, Robert HUDEČEK, Petr ŠTOURAČ, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ a Pavel VENTRUBA. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study. \textit{International urogynecology journal}. London: Springer London, 2016, roč.~27, č.~5, s.~791-796. ISSN~0937-3462. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci