Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator
mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women
with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

J 2016

Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela, Martin HUSER, Atanas-Ivan BELKOV, Petr JANKŮ, Robert HUDEČEK et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

Authors

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Martin HUSER (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Atanas-Ivan BELKOV (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr JANKŮ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Robert HUDEČEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr ŠTOURAČ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Pavel VENTRUBA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

International urogynecology journal, London, Springer London, 2016, 0937-3462

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impact factor

Impact factor: 1.937

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/16:00089792

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2

UT WoS

000374572900015

Keywords in English

Stress urinary incontinence; Mid-urethral sling; Single-incision sling ; Efficacy; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial

Abstract

V originále

Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient’s life quality.

Citovat

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela, Martin HUSER, Atanas-Ivan BELKOV, Petr JANKŮ, Robert HUDEČEK, Petr ŠTOURAČ, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ and Pavel VENTRUBA. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study. International urogynecology journal. London: Springer London, 2016, vol. 27, No 5, p. 791-796. ISSN 0937-3462. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2.

@article{1343717,
   author = {Juráková, Michaela and Huser, Martin and Belkov, AtanasandIvan and Janků, Petr and Hudeček, Robert and Štourač, Petr and Jarkovský, Jiří and Ventruba, Pavel},
   article_location = {London},
   article_number = {5},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2},
   keywords = {Stress urinary incontinence; Mid-urethral sling; Single-incision sling ; Efficacy; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0937-3462},
   journal = {International urogynecology journal},
   title = {Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study},
   volume = {27},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1343717
AU  - Juráková, Michaela - Huser, Martin - Belkov, Atanas-Ivan - Janků, Petr - Hudeček, Robert - Štourač, Petr - Jarkovský, Jiří - Ventruba, Pavel
PY  - 2016
TI  - Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study
JF  - International urogynecology journal
VL  - 27
IS  - 5
SP  - 791-796
EP  - 791-796
PB  - Springer London
SN  - 09373462
KW  - Stress urinary incontinence
KW  - Mid-urethral sling
KW  - Single-incision sling
KW  - Efficacy
KW  - Patient-reported outcomes
KW  - Randomized controlled trial
N2  - Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient’s life quality.
ER  -

JURÁKOVÁ, Michaela, Martin HUSER, Atanas-Ivan BELKOV, Petr JANKŮ, Robert HUDEČEK, Petr ŠTOURAČ, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ and Pavel VENTRUBA. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study. \textit{International urogynecology journal}. London: Springer London, 2016, vol.~27, No~5, p.~791-796. ISSN~0937-3462. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2.

Detailed Information on Publication Record