2016
Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries
WRIGHT, Michelle, Takuya YANAGIDA, Anna ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, Ikuko AOYAMA, Lenka DĚDKOVÁ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries
Název česky
Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries
Autoři
WRIGHT, Michelle (840 Spojené státy, garant, domácí), Takuya YANAGIDA (56 Belgie), Anna ŠEVČÍKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Ikuko AOYAMA (56 Belgie), Lenka DĚDKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Hana MACHÁČKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zheng LI (56 Belgie), Shanmukh V. KAMBLE (56 Belgie), Fatih BAYRAKTAR (196 Kypr, domácí), Shruti SOUDI (56 Belgie), Li LEI (56 Belgie) a Chang SHU (56 Belgie)
Vydání
International Journal of Developmental Science, 2016, 2192-001X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/16:00089947
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
Klíčová slova anglicky
cyberbullying; online victimisation; coping strategies
Změněno: 21. 7. 2016 23:13, doc. Mgr. Anna Ševčíková, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The aim of this study was to examine the role of publicity (private versus public) and medium (face-to-face versus cyber) in adolescents’ coping strategies for hypothetical victimization, while also considering culture. Participants were adolescents from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. The study also controlled for adolescents’ gender, individualism, and collectivism. Adolescents completed questionnaires on the hypothetical coping strategies that they would use for four scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, private face-to-face victimization, and private cyber victimization. Overall, the findings revealed that adolescents relied more on avoidance, social support, retaliation, helplessness, and ignoring for public and face-to-face forms of victimization than for private and cyber forms of victimization. Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies are discussed.