J 2016

Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries

WRIGHT, Michelle, Takuya YANAGIDA, Anna ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, Ikuko AOYAMA, Lenka DĚDKOVÁ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries

Název česky

Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries

Autoři

WRIGHT, Michelle (840 Spojené státy, garant, domácí), Takuya YANAGIDA (56 Belgie), Anna ŠEVČÍKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Ikuko AOYAMA (56 Belgie), Lenka DĚDKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Hana MACHÁČKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zheng LI (56 Belgie), Shanmukh V. KAMBLE (56 Belgie), Fatih BAYRAKTAR (196 Kypr, domácí), Shruti SOUDI (56 Belgie), Li LEI (56 Belgie) a Chang SHU (56 Belgie)

Vydání

International Journal of Developmental Science, 2016, 2192-001X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/16:00089947

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

cyberbullying; online victimisation; coping strategies
Změněno: 21. 7. 2016 23:13, doc. Mgr. Anna Ševčíková, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The aim of this study was to examine the role of publicity (private versus public) and medium (face-to-face versus cyber) in adolescents’ coping strategies for hypothetical victimization, while also considering culture. Participants were adolescents from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. The study also controlled for adolescents’ gender, individualism, and collectivism. Adolescents completed questionnaires on the hypothetical coping strategies that they would use for four scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, private face-to-face victimization, and private cyber victimization. Overall, the findings revealed that adolescents relied more on avoidance, social support, retaliation, helplessness, and ignoring for public and face-to-face forms of victimization than for private and cyber forms of victimization. Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies are discussed.