2016
Argumentation and Requirement of Consistency
ONDRÁČEK, TomášZákladní údaje
Originální název
Argumentation and Requirement of Consistency
Autoři
ONDRÁČEK, Tomáš (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
The 5th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation, Tokyo, 6-7 August 2016, 2016
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Stát vydavatele
Japonsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/16:00090624
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
argumentation; consistency; requirement of consistency; theory of argumentation
Štítky
Změněno: 3. 4. 2017 18:05, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková
Anotace
V originále
The consistency is considered to be a fundamental requirement within any system of propositions. Inconsistencies are generally regarded as something we should avoid or refuse. If we consider an argumentation as something that has a dynamic character and what is essentially non-monotonic, for a refutation to be possible, questions arise. To what is the requirement of consistency applied? When a speaker has to be consistent? When is permissible to avoid this criterion? The goal is to present a more precise criterion of consistency. This is done by dividing an argumentation to fundamental parts which need to be internally consistent but which need not to be consistent with each other. The presented approach then extends borders of a rational discussion and makes also possible to point out (false) accusations of an inconsistency which are not useful to resolve a difference of opinion.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/0991/2015, interní kód MU |
|