In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation
and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits:
effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods

J 2016

In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods

TROPEK, Robert, Ilona ČERNÁ, Jakub STRAKA, Petr KOČÁREK, Igor MALENOVSKÝ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods

Autoři

TROPEK, Robert (203 Česká republika, garant), Ilona ČERNÁ (203 Česká republika), Jakub STRAKA (203 Česká republika), Petr KOČÁREK (203 Česká republika), Igor MALENOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Filip TICHÁNEK (203 Česká republika) a Pavel ŠEBEK (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer, 2016, 0944-1344

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10600 1.6 Biological sciences

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.741

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/16:00091082

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1

UT WoS

000379553500008

Klíčová slova anglicky

Aculeata;Araneae;Auchenorrhyncha;Coal combustion;Human-made habitats;Restoration ecology;Orthoptera;Syrphidae

Štítky

AKR, rivok

Změněno: 16. 2. 2018 22:17, Mgr. Igor Malenovský, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Recently, fly ash deposits have been revealed as a secondary refuge of critically endangered arthropods specialised on aeolian sands in Central Europe. Simultaneously, these anthropogenic habitats are well known for their negative impact on human health and the surrounding environment. The overwhelming majority of these risks are caused by wind erosion, the substantial decreasing of which is thus necessary. But, any effects of anti-dust treatments on endangered arthropods have never been studied. We surveyed communities of five arthropod groups (wild bees and wasps, leafhoppers, spiders, hoverflies and orthopteroid insects) colonising three fly ash deposits in the western Czech Republic. We focused on two different anti-dust treatments (~70 and 100 % cover of fly ash by barren soil) and their comparison with a control of bare fly ash. Altogether, we recorded 495 species, including 132 nationally threatened species (eight of them were considered to be extinct in the country) and/or 30 species strictly specialised to drift sands. Bees and wasps and leafhoppers contained the overwhelming majority of species of the highest conservation interest; a few other important records were also in spiders and orthopteroids. Total soil cover depleted the unique environment of fly ash and thus destroyed the high conservation potential of the deposits. On the other hand, partial coverage (with ~30 % of bare fly ash) still offered habitats for many of the most threatened species, as we showed by both regression and multivariate analyses, with a decrease of wind erosion. This topic still needs much more research interest, but we consider mosaic-like preservation of smaller spots of fly ash as one of the possible compromises between biodiversity and human health.

Citovat

TROPEK, Robert, Ilona ČERNÁ, Jakub STRAKA, Petr KOČÁREK, Igor MALENOVSKÝ, Filip TICHÁNEK a Pavel ŠEBEK. In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Springer, 2016, roč. 23, č. 14, s. 13653-13660. ISSN 0944-1344. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1.

@article{1355965,
   author = {Tropek, Robert and Černá, Ilona and Straka, Jakub and Kočárek, Petr and Malenovský, Igor and Tichánek, Filip and Šebek, Pavel},
   article_number = {14},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1},
   keywords = {Aculeata;Araneae;Auchenorrhyncha;Coal combustion;Human-made habitats;Restoration ecology;Orthoptera;Syrphidae},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0944-1344},
   journal = {Environmental Science and Pollution Research},
   title = {In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods},
   url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1},
   volume = {23},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1355965
AU  - Tropek, Robert - Černá, Ilona - Straka, Jakub - Kočárek, Petr - Malenovský, Igor - Tichánek, Filip - Šebek, Pavel
PY  - 2016
TI  - In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods
JF  - Environmental Science and Pollution Research
VL  - 23
IS  - 14
SP  - 13653-13660
EP  - 13653-13660
PB  - Springer
SN  - 09441344
KW  - Aculeata;Araneae;Auchenorrhyncha;Coal combustion;Human-made habitats;Restoration ecology;Orthoptera;Syrphidae
UR  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1
L2  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1
N2  - Recently, fly ash deposits have been revealed as a secondary refuge of critically endangered arthropods specialised on aeolian sands in Central Europe. Simultaneously, these anthropogenic habitats are well known for their negative impact on human health and the surrounding environment. The overwhelming majority of these risks are caused by wind erosion, the substantial decreasing of which is thus necessary. But, any effects of anti-dust treatments on endangered arthropods have never been studied. We surveyed communities of five arthropod groups (wild bees and wasps, leafhoppers, spiders, hoverflies and orthopteroid insects) colonising three fly ash deposits in the western Czech Republic. We focused on two different anti-dust treatments (~70 and 100 % cover of fly ash by barren soil) and their comparison with a control of bare fly ash. Altogether, we recorded 495 species, including 132 nationally threatened species (eight of them were considered to be extinct in the country) and/or 30 species strictly specialised to drift sands. Bees and wasps and leafhoppers contained the overwhelming majority of species of the highest conservation interest; a few other important records were also in spiders and orthopteroids. Total soil cover depleted the unique environment of fly ash and thus destroyed the high conservation potential of the deposits. On the other hand, partial coverage (with ~30 % of bare fly ash) still offered habitats for many of the most threatened species, as we showed by both regression and multivariate analyses, with a decrease of wind erosion. This topic still needs much more research interest, but we consider mosaic-like preservation of smaller spots of fly ash as one of the possible compromises between biodiversity and human health.
ER  -

TROPEK, Robert, Ilona ČERNÁ, Jakub STRAKA, Petr KOČÁREK, Igor MALENOVSKÝ, Filip TICHÁNEK a Pavel ŠEBEK. In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods. \textit{Environmental Science and Pollution Research}. Springer, 2016, roč.~23, č.~14, s.~13653-13660. ISSN~0944-1344. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci