Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inproceedings{1356132,
author = {Svačinová, Iva},
address = {Oradea, Debrecen},
booktitle = {Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions},
editor = {Bakó, Rozália Klára; Horváth, Gizela},
keywords = {argument scheme; pragma-dialectics; reciprocity; the new rhetoric},
howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
language = {eng},
location = {Oradea, Debrecen},
pages = {33-62},
publisher = {Partium Press, Debrecen University Press},
title = {Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments},
url = {https://argumentor.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/argumentor-2016_proceedings.pdf},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1356132
AU - Svačinová, Iva
PY - 2016
TI - Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments
PB - Partium Press, Debrecen University Press
CY - Oradea, Debrecen
KW - argument scheme
KW - pragma-dialectics
KW - reciprocity
KW - the new rhetoric
UR - https://argumentor.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/argumentor-2016_proceedings.pdf
N2 - In their famous The New rhetoric Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca presented a category of quasi-logical arguments as persuasive because of their similarity with mathematical and logical demonstrations. In this article, the persuasiveness of the quasi-logical argument is viewed from the perspective of pragma-dialectics. The first part of the article deals with the possibilities of transformation of the concept of quasi-logical arguments presented by the new rhetoric in accordance with meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics. The crucial problem seems to be the identification of the function of quasi-logical arguments in solving a conflict of opinion. The second part compares the options of functionalization of quasi-logical arguments in a case study of their subtype, arguments of reciprocity. This paper presents a functionalization submitted by Bart Garssen that identifies quasi-logical reciprocity as one argument scheme appealing to the principle of “giving in return.” A competing functionalization is then presented based on the reconstruction of illustrations in The New rhetoric that correspond to the type of reciprocal relationships as “give-give” that are also considered by Garssen. It is shown that reciprocal arguments in The New rhetoric are not limited to one scheme in a pragma-dialectical sense, but the arguments with this type of reciprocal relationship can implement three different schemes.
ER -
SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments. In Bakó, Rozália Klára; Horváth, Gizela. \textit{Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions}. Oradea, Debrecen: Partium Press, Debrecen University Press, 2016, s.~33-62. ISSN~2285-682X.
|
