Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?
Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments

D 2016

Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva

Základní údaje

Originální název

Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments

Autoři

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Oradea, Debrecen, Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions, od s. 33-62, 30 s. 2016

Nakladatel

Partium Press, Debrecen University Press

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Stát vydavatele

Rumunsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/16:00091117

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISSN

Klíčová slova anglicky

argument scheme; pragma-dialectics; reciprocity; the new rhetoric

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 4. 2017 18:02, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková

Anotace

V originále

In their famous The New rhetoric Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca presented a category of quasi-logical arguments as persuasive because of their similarity with mathematical and logical demonstrations. In this article, the persuasiveness of the quasi-logical argument is viewed from the perspective of pragma-dialectics. The first part of the article deals with the possibilities of transformation of the concept of quasi-logical arguments presented by the new rhetoric in accordance with meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics. The crucial problem seems to be the identification of the function of quasi-logical arguments in solving a conflict of opinion. The second part compares the options of functionalization of quasi-logical arguments in a case study of their subtype, arguments of reciprocity. This paper presents a functionalization submitted by Bart Garssen that identifies quasi-logical reciprocity as one argument scheme appealing to the principle of “giving in return.” A competing functionalization is then presented based on the reconstruction of illustrations in The New rhetoric that correspond to the type of reciprocal relationships as “give-give” that are also considered by Garssen. It is shown that reciprocal arguments in The New rhetoric are not limited to one scheme in a pragma-dialectical sense, but the arguments with this type of reciprocal relationship can implement three different schemes.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0991/2015, interní kód MU

Název: Perspektivy a výzvy filozofických zkoumání

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Perspektivy a výzvy filozofických zkoumání, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments. In Bakó, Rozália Klára; Horváth, Gizela. Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions. Oradea, Debrecen: Partium Press, Debrecen University Press, 2016, s. 33-62. ISSN 2285-682X.

@inproceedings{1356132,
   author = {Svačinová, Iva},
   address = {Oradea, Debrecen},
   booktitle = {Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions},
   editor = {Bakó, Rozália Klára; Horváth, Gizela},
   keywords = {argument scheme; pragma-dialectics; reciprocity; the new rhetoric},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Oradea, Debrecen},
   pages = {33-62},
   publisher = {Partium Press, Debrecen University Press},
   title = {Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments},
   url = {https://argumentor.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/argumentor-2016_proceedings.pdf},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1356132
AU  - Svačinová, Iva
PY  - 2016
TI  - Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments
PB  - Partium Press, Debrecen University Press
CY  - Oradea, Debrecen
KW  - argument scheme
KW  - pragma-dialectics
KW  - reciprocity
KW  - the new rhetoric
UR  - https://argumentor.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/argumentor-2016_proceedings.pdf
N2  - In their famous The New rhetoric Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca presented a category of quasi-logical arguments as persuasive because of their similarity with mathematical and logical demonstrations. In this article, the persuasiveness of the quasi-logical argument is viewed from the perspective of pragma-dialectics. The first part of the article deals with the possibilities of transformation of the concept of quasi-logical arguments presented by the new rhetoric in accordance with meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics. The crucial problem seems to be the identification of the function of quasi-logical arguments in solving a conflict of opinion. The second part compares the options of functionalization of quasi-logical arguments in a case study of their subtype, arguments of reciprocity. This paper presents a functionalization submitted by Bart Garssen that identifies quasi-logical reciprocity as one argument scheme appealing to the principle of “giving in return.” A competing functionalization is then presented based on the reconstruction of illustrations in The New rhetoric that correspond to the type of reciprocal relationships as “give-give” that are also considered by Garssen. It is shown that reciprocal arguments in The New rhetoric are not limited to one scheme in a pragma-dialectical sense, but the arguments with this type of reciprocal relationship can implement three different schemes.
ER  -

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? Pragma-dialectical investigation into quasi-logical arguments. In Bakó, Rozália Klára; Horváth, Gizela. \textit{Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions}. Oradea, Debrecen: Partium Press, Debrecen University Press, 2016, s.~33-62. ISSN~2285-682X.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci