Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?

k 2016

Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva

Základní údaje

Originální název

Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?

Autoři

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions, 7.- 8. 10. 2016, Oradea, Romania, 2016

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Stát vydavatele

Rumunsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/16:00091118

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

argument scheme; pragma-dialectics; reciprocity; the new rhetoric

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 4. 2017 18:01, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková

Anotace

V originále

In their famous The New rhetoric Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca presented a category of quasi-logical arguments as persuasive because of their similarity with mathematical and logical demonstrations. In this article, the persuasiveness of the quasi-logical argument is viewed from the perspective of pragma-dialectics. The first part of the article deals with the possibilities of transformation of the concept of quasi-logical arguments presented by the new rhetoric in accordance with meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics. The crucial problem seems to be the identification of the function of quasi-logical arguments in solving a conflict of opinion. The second part compares the options of functionalization of quasi-logical arguments in a case study of their subtype, arguments of reciprocity. This paper presents a functionalization submitted by Bart Garssen that identifies quasi-logical reciprocity as one argument scheme appealing to the principle of “giving in return.” A competing functionalization is then presented based on the reconstruction of illustrations in The New rhetoric that correspond to the type of reciprocal relationships as “give-give” that are also considered by Garssen. It is shown that reciprocal arguments in The New rhetoric are not limited to one scheme in a pragma-dialectical sense, but the arguments with this type of reciprocal relationship can implement three different schemes.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0991/2015, interní kód MU

Název: Perspektivy a výzvy filozofických zkoumání

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Perspektivy a výzvy filozofických zkoumání, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? In Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions, 7.- 8. 10. 2016, Oradea, Romania. 2016.

@proceedings{1356133,
   author = {Svačinová, Iva},
   booktitle = {Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions, 7.- 8. 10. 2016, Oradea, Romania},
   keywords = {argument scheme; pragma-dialectics; reciprocity; the new rhetoric},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?},
   url = {https://argumentor.wordpress.com/},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1356133
AU  - Svačinová, Iva
PY  - 2016
TI  - Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?
KW  - argument scheme
KW  - pragma-dialectics
KW  - reciprocity
KW  - the new rhetoric
UR  - https://argumentor.wordpress.com/
L2  - https://argumentor.wordpress.com/
N2  - In their famous The New rhetoric Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca presented a category of quasi-logical arguments as persuasive because of their similarity with mathematical and logical demonstrations. In this article, the persuasiveness of the quasi-logical argument is viewed from the perspective of pragma-dialectics. The first part of the article deals with the possibilities of transformation of the concept of quasi-logical arguments presented by the new rhetoric in accordance with meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics. The crucial problem seems to be the identification of the function of quasi-logical arguments in solving a conflict of opinion. The second part compares the options of functionalization of quasi-logical arguments in a case study of their subtype, arguments of reciprocity. This paper presents a functionalization submitted by Bart Garssen that identifies quasi-logical reciprocity as one argument scheme appealing to the principle of “giving in return.” A competing functionalization is then presented based on the reconstruction of illustrations in The New rhetoric that correspond to the type of reciprocal relationships as “give-give” that are also considered by Garssen. It is shown that reciprocal arguments in The New rhetoric are not limited to one scheme in a pragma-dialectical sense, but the arguments with this type of reciprocal relationship can implement three different schemes.
ER  -

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not? In \textit{Argumentor 4: Mens Sana: Rethinking the Role of Emotions, 7.- 8. 10. 2016, Oradea, Romania}. 2016.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci