Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid
oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from
sediment

J 2016

Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment

SADÍLEK, Jan, Petra SPÁLOVSKÁ, Branislav VRANA, Milada VAVROVA, Blahoslav MARŠÁLEK et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment

Autoři

SADÍLEK, Jan (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petra SPÁLOVSKÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Branislav VRANA (703 Slovensko, domácí), Milada VAVROVA (203 Česká republika), Blahoslav MARŠÁLEK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Zdeněk ŠIMEK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

International Journal of environmental analytical Chemistry, ABINGDON (ENGLAND), TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2016, 0306-7319

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30304 Public and environmental health

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.208

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/16:00088269

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718

UT WoS

000384556600002

Klíčová slova anglicky

Oestrogens; sediment; Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE); accelerated solvent extraction (ASE); microwave-assisted extraction (MAE); quick easy cheap effective rugged safe (QuEChERS)

Štítky

AKR, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 2. 3. 2017 11:55, Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The comparison of four extraction techniques for isolation of five native and one labelled steroid oestrogens from sediment was described. The three conventional extraction techniques Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and a promising technique QuEChERS were tested for isolation of low environmentally relevant oestrogen concentrations using different extraction conditions. The least expensive and time-consuming method QuEChERS provided the best extraction recoveries (53-84%) from all techniques. MAE achieved the highest recovery from conventional techniques for less polar oestrogens using dichloromethane: acetone 3:1 mixture as an extraction solvent (50-71%), but for extraction of the whole group of oestrogens including more polar estriol acetone or methanol must be used. ASE provided higher extraction recoveries using dichloromethane at 60 degrees C (53-74%) for less polar oestrogens. However, the repeatability of results was unsatisfactory and recoveries using other extraction conditions were lower than for MAE. The most time-consuming SWE achieved the worst extraction recoveries and for isolation of low oestrogen concentrations from sediments, it is completely unsuitable.

Návaznosti

GA13-20357S, projekt VaV

Název: Studium distribuce steroidních látek ve složkách pevných environmentálních matric.

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Studium distribuce steroidních látek ve složkách pevných environmentálních matric

LM2011028, projekt VaV

Název: RECETOX ? Národní infrastruktura pro výzkum toxických látek v prostředí

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, RECETOX Národní infrastruktura pro výzkum toxických látek v prostředí

LO1214, projekt VaV

Název: Centrum pro výzkum toxických látek v prostředí (Akronym: RECETOX)

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Centrum pro výzkum toxických látek v prostředí

Citovat

SADÍLEK, Jan, Petra SPÁLOVSKÁ, Branislav VRANA, Milada VAVROVA, Blahoslav MARŠÁLEK a Zdeněk ŠIMEK. Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment. International Journal of environmental analytical Chemistry. ABINGDON (ENGLAND): TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2016, roč. 96, č. 11, s. 1022-1037. ISSN 0306-7319. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718.

@article{1358089,
   author = {Sadílek, Jan and Spálovská, Petra and Vrana, Branislav and Vavrova, Milada and Maršálek, Blahoslav and Šimek, Zdeněk},
   article_location = {ABINGDON (ENGLAND)},
   article_number = {11},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718},
   keywords = {Oestrogens; sediment; Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE); accelerated solvent extraction (ASE); microwave-assisted extraction (MAE); quick easy cheap effective rugged safe (QuEChERS)},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0306-7319},
   journal = {International Journal of environmental analytical Chemistry},
   title = {Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment},
   url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718?journalCode=geac20},
   volume = {96},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1358089
AU  - Sadílek, Jan - Spálovská, Petra - Vrana, Branislav - Vavrova, Milada - Maršálek, Blahoslav - Šimek, Zdeněk
PY  - 2016
TI  - Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment
JF  - International Journal of environmental analytical Chemistry
VL  - 96
IS  - 11
SP  - 1022-1037
EP  - 1022-1037
PB  - TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
SN  - 03067319
KW  - Oestrogens
KW  - sediment
KW  - Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE)
KW  - accelerated solvent extraction (ASE)
KW  - microwave-assisted extraction (MAE)
KW  - quick easy cheap effective rugged safe (QuEChERS)
UR  - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718?journalCode=geac20
L2  - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718?journalCode=geac20
N2  - The comparison of four extraction techniques for isolation of five native and one labelled steroid oestrogens from sediment was described. The three conventional extraction techniques Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and a promising technique QuEChERS were tested for isolation of low environmentally relevant oestrogen concentrations using different extraction conditions. The least expensive and time-consuming method QuEChERS provided the best extraction recoveries (53-84%) from all techniques. MAE achieved the highest recovery from conventional techniques for less polar oestrogens using dichloromethane: acetone 3:1 mixture as an extraction solvent (50-71%), but for extraction of the whole group of oestrogens including more polar estriol acetone or methanol must be used. ASE provided higher extraction recoveries using dichloromethane at 60 degrees C (53-74%) for less polar oestrogens. However, the repeatability of results was unsatisfactory and recoveries using other extraction conditions were lower than for MAE. The most time-consuming SWE achieved the worst extraction recoveries and for isolation of low oestrogen concentrations from sediments, it is completely unsuitable.
ER  -

SADÍLEK, Jan, Petra SPÁLOVSKÁ, Branislav VRANA, Milada VAVROVA, Blahoslav MARŠÁLEK a Zdeněk ŠIMEK. Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment. \textit{International Journal of environmental analytical Chemistry}. ABINGDON (ENGLAND): TAYLOR \&{} FRANCIS LTD, 2016, roč.~96, č.~11, s.~1022-1037. ISSN~0306-7319. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1232718.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci