2016
Bumbling Idiots or Evil Masterminds? Challenging Cold War Stereotypes about Women, Sexuality and State Socialism
GHODSEE, Kristen a Kateřina LIŠKOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Bumbling Idiots or Evil Masterminds? Challenging Cold War Stereotypes about Women, Sexuality and State Socialism
Autoři
GHODSEE, Kristen (840 Spojené státy) a Kateřina LIŠKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY-FILOZOFIJA I DRUSTVO, Beograd, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Beograd University, 2016, 0353-5738
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50403 Social topics
Stát vydavatele
Srbsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/16:00088274
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
000408372100001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Cold War; common knowledge; state socialism; anti-communism; women; family; gender; sexuality; Eastern Europe; communism
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 11. 2019 13:59, Mgr. Michal Petr
Anotace
V originále
In academic writing, facts about the past generally require the citation of relevant sources unless the fact or idea is considered “common knowledge:” bits of information or dates upon which there is a wide scholarly consensus. This brief article reflects on the use of “common knowledge” claims in contemporary scholarship about women, families, and sexuality as experienced during 20th century, East European, state socialist regimes. We focus on several key stereo- types about the communist state and the situation of women that are often asserted in the scholarly literature, and argue that many of these ideas uncannily resemble American anti-communist propaganda. When contemporary scholars make claims about communist intrusions into the private sphere to effect social engineering or the inefficacy of state socialist mass organizations or communist efforts to break up the family or indoctrinate the young, they often do so without citation to previous sources or empirical evidence supporting their claims, thereby suggesting that such claims are “common knowledge.” We believe that those wishing to assert such claims should link these assertions to concrete originating sources, lest it turn out the “common knowledge” derives, in fact, from western Cold War rhetoric.
Návaznosti
GJ16-10639Y, projekt VaV |
|