A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?

C 2016

A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?

KUNDT, Radek

Základní údaje

Originální název

A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?

Autoři

KUNDT, Radek (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Leiden Boston, Conversations and Controversies in the Scientific Study of Religion: Collaborative and Co-Authored Essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe, od s. 256-259, 4 s. Suplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion sv. 5, 2016

Nakladatel

Brill

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/16:00091609

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISBN

978-90-04-31044-5

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310452

Klíčová slova anglicky

religious studies; cognitive science of religion; philosophy of science

Štítky

rivok, topvydavatel

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 27. 3. 2017 10:36, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková

Anotace

V originále

In my response to Martin and Wiebe's academic confession, I try to show that there is a major inconsistency in their argument. This inconsistency resides within their partial and therefore biased application of universal unconscious mechanisms that constrain the human mind, where the application should have been complete. Their argument should have been directed at all sciences or at science in general in order for it to be sound, and not particularly at Religious Studies. This would result in the argument that any scientific discipline is a delusion, which is an outcome Martin and Wiebe do not hold, as they make science a sine qua non for their own argument.

Návaznosti

EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV

Název: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství

Citovat

KUNDT, Radek. A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion? In Luther H. Martin; Wiebe, Donald. Conversations and Controversies in the Scientific Study of Religion: Collaborative and Co-Authored Essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe. Leiden Boston: Brill, 2016, s. 256-259. Suplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion sv. 5. ISBN 978-90-04-31044-5. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310452.

@inbook{1359857,
   author = {Kundt, Radek},
   address = {Leiden Boston},
   booktitle = {Conversations and Controversies in the Scientific Study of Religion: Collaborative and Co-Authored Essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310452},
   editor = {Luther H. Martin; Wiebe, Donald},
   keywords = {religious studies; cognitive science of religion; philosophy of science},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Leiden Boston},
   isbn = {978-90-04-31044-5},
   pages = {256-259},
   publisher = {Brill},
   title = {A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1359857
AU  - Kundt, Radek
PY  - 2016
TI  - A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?
VL  - Suplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion sv. 5
PB  - Brill
CY  - Leiden Boston
SN  - 9789004310445
KW  - religious studies
KW  - cognitive science of religion
KW  - philosophy of science
N2  - In my response to Martin and Wiebe's academic confession, I try to show that there is a major inconsistency in their argument. This inconsistency resides within their partial and therefore biased application of universal unconscious mechanisms that constrain the human mind, where the application should have been complete. Their argument should have been directed at all sciences or at science in general in order for it to be sound, and not particularly at Religious Studies. This would result in the argument that any scientific discipline is a delusion, which is an outcome Martin and Wiebe do not hold, as they make science a sine qua non for their own argument.
ER  -

KUNDT, Radek. A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion? In Luther H. Martin; Wiebe, Donald. \textit{Conversations and Controversies in the Scientific Study of Religion: Collaborative and Co-Authored Essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe}. Leiden Boston: Brill, 2016, s.~256-259. Suplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion sv. 5. ISBN~978-90-04-31044-5. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310452.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci