Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon
sequestration and protect biodiversity

J 2016

Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity

BURRASCANO, Sabina, Milan CHYTRÝ, Tobias KUEMMERLE, Eleonora GIARRIZZO, Sebastiaan LUYSSAERT et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity

Autoři

BURRASCANO, Sabina (380 Itálie), Milan CHYTRÝ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Tobias KUEMMERLE (276 Německo), Eleonora GIARRIZZO (380 Itálie), Sebastiaan LUYSSAERT (528 Nizozemské království), Francesco Maria SABATINI (380 Itálie) a Carlo BLASI (380 Itálie)

Vydání

Biological Conservation, Elsevier, 2016, 0006-3207

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10600 1.6 Biological sciences

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/16:00091612

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005

UT WoS

000384782800044

Klíčová slova anglicky

Afforestation; Carbon management; Climate change mitigation; Common Agricultural Policy; Grassland biodiversity; Habitats Directive

Štítky

AKR, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 13. 3. 2018 10:26, Mgr. Lucie Jarošová, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

The extension of forest area is a globally accepted tool to offset CO2 emissions from deforestation and the combustion of fossil fuels. The common assumption is that in addition to the perceived climate benefits increasing forest area will also support biodiversity, thus making afforestation a “win-win scenario”. Based on the existing scientific evidences, we show that joined climate and biodiversity benefits are strongly context-dependent and that the outcome of afforestation is often highly questionable. In Europe, grasslands managed at low intensity contribute substantially to biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. However, many of these grasslands have been lost due to abandonment and subsequent spontaneous succession towards woody vegetation, or due to land use intensification. Moreover, grasslands are the ecosystems most often deliberately afforested in the context of EU carbon-centered policies that may thus counteract biodiversity conservation programmes. By reviewing the main EU policies targeting forests and grasslands, we found a striking ambivalence between policies and funding schemes addressing grassland conservation on the one hand (e.g. Habitats Directive, green payments within the Common Agricultural Policy) and those supporting afforestation on the other (e.g. rural development funds). We suggest three measures towards a better harmonization of the European Union policies that target forest and grassland ecosystems: (1) promoting the alignment of the decisions taken across different policy sectors; (2) focusing on the whole range of ecosystem services and biodiversity issues rather than on carbon management only; (3) valuing systems managed at low-intensity for their multifunctionality.

Citovat

BURRASCANO, Sabina, Milan CHYTRÝ, Tobias KUEMMERLE, Eleonora GIARRIZZO, Sebastiaan LUYSSAERT, Francesco Maria SABATINI a Carlo BLASI. Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity. Biological Conservation. Elsevier, 2016, roč. 201, September, s. 370-376. ISSN 0006-3207. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005.

@article{1359879,
   author = {Burrascano, Sabina and Chytrý, Milan and Kuemmerle, Tobias and Giarrizzo, Eleonora and Luyssaert, Sebastiaan and Sabatini, Francesco Maria and Blasi, Carlo},
   article_number = {September},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005},
   keywords = {Afforestation; Carbon management; Climate change mitigation; Common Agricultural Policy; Grassland biodiversity; Habitats Directive},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0006-3207},
   journal = {Biological Conservation},
   title = {Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity},
   url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320716303081},
   volume = {201},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1359879
AU  - Burrascano, Sabina - Chytrý, Milan - Kuemmerle, Tobias - Giarrizzo, Eleonora - Luyssaert, Sebastiaan - Sabatini, Francesco Maria - Blasi, Carlo
PY  - 2016
TI  - Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity
JF  - Biological Conservation
VL  - 201
IS  - September
SP  - 370-376
EP  - 370-376
PB  - Elsevier
SN  - 00063207
KW  - Afforestation
KW  - Carbon management
KW  - Climate change mitigation
KW  - Common Agricultural Policy
KW  - Grassland biodiversity
KW  - Habitats Directive
UR  - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320716303081
N2  - The extension of forest area is a globally accepted tool to offset CO2 emissions from deforestation and the combustion of fossil fuels. The common assumption is that in addition to the perceived climate benefits increasing forest area will also support biodiversity, thus making afforestation a “win-win scenario”. Based on the existing scientific evidences, we show that joined climate and biodiversity benefits are strongly context-dependent and that the outcome of afforestation is often highly questionable. In Europe, grasslands managed at low intensity contribute substantially to biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. However, many of these grasslands have been lost due to abandonment and subsequent spontaneous succession towards woody vegetation, or due to land use intensification. Moreover, grasslands are the ecosystems most often deliberately afforested in the context of EU carbon-centered policies that may thus counteract biodiversity conservation programmes. By reviewing the main EU policies targeting forests and grasslands, we found a striking ambivalence between policies and funding schemes addressing grassland conservation on the one hand (e.g. Habitats Directive, green payments within the Common Agricultural Policy) and those supporting afforestation on the other (e.g. rural development funds). We suggest three measures towards a better harmonization of the European Union policies that target forest and grassland ecosystems: (1) promoting the alignment of the decisions taken across different policy sectors; (2) focusing on the whole range of ecosystem services and biodiversity issues rather than on carbon management only; (3) valuing systems managed at low-intensity for their multifunctionality.
ER  -

BURRASCANO, Sabina, Milan CHYTRÝ, Tobias KUEMMERLE, Eleonora GIARRIZZO, Sebastiaan LUYSSAERT, Francesco Maria SABATINI a Carlo BLASI. Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity. \textit{Biological Conservation}. Elsevier, 2016, roč.~201, September, s.~370-376. ISSN~0006-3207. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci