2016
Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration
REMSOVÁ, KateřinaZákladní údaje
Originální název
Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration
Autoři
REMSOVÁ, Kateřina (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
Brno, COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings, od s. 150-166, 17 s. 2016
Nakladatel
Masaryk University
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
50501 Law
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/16:00092715
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
ISBN
978-80-210-8356-1
UT WoS
000460199300009
Klíčová slova anglicky
Arbitration in employment relationship; Consumer arbitration; Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards; Protection of the employee; Employment disputes of property nature
Štítky
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 10. 9. 2019 12:31, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Anotace
V originále
The paper deals with different approaches to consumer and employee in terms of the protection granted to them in domestic and international arbitration. Czech Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards applies to both domestic and international arbitration and assumes standards of consumer protection of European union law into the consumer arbitration. Employee, however, this Act provides no protection. In a post on the last year of this conference I addressed the issue of arbitrability of individual employment disputes and I conclude that employment disputes of property nature only are arbitrable. This follow paper discusses the differences between consumer and employment disputes of property nature and addresses the question of the reasons why employee are not granted the same level of protection as consumer. The aim of this paper is comparison of regulation of consumer arbitration and arbitration in employment relations in terms of the scope of protection afforded by Act to consumer or employee and finding reasons why an employee does not obtain similar protection as a consumer in the arbitration.
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/1075/2015, interní kód MU |
|