Teze o přelití v participativní demokracii: Empirická relevance a normativní udržitelnost

ČAMBORA, Jan a Pavel DUFEK. Teze o přelití v participativní demokracii: Empirická relevance a normativní udržitelnost. Politologická revue. 2016, roč. 22, č. 2, s. 75-102. ISSN 1211-0353.

Základní údaje

• Originální název: Teze o přelití v participativní demokracii: Empirická relevance a normativní udržitelnost
• Název anglicky: The Spillover Thesis in Participatory Democratic Theory: Empirical Relevance and Normative Defensibility
• Autoři: ČAMBORA, Jan (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Pavel DUFEK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
• Vydání: Politologická revue, 2016, 1211-0353.

Další údaje

• Originální jazyk: čeština
• Typ výsledku: Článek v odborném periodiku
• Obor: 50601 Political science
• Stát vydavatele: Česká republika
• Utajení: není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
• WWW: URL
• Kód RIV: RIV/00216224:14230/16:00088535
• Organizační jednotka: Fakulta sociálních studií
• Klíčová slova česky: přelití; Carole Pateman; demokracie na pracovišti; participativní demokracie; deliberativní demokracie
• Klíčová slova anglicky: spillover; Carole Pateman; Workplace Democracy; Participatory Democracy; Deliberative Democracy
• Příznaky: Recenzováno

Anotace

The paper focuses on the “spillover thesis” which constitutes a pillar of much of contemporary participatory democratic theory; specifically, we assess the claim that workplace democratization leads to a higher degree of political participation amongst labourers. The paper analyses the thesis as formulated by Carole Pateman, including its later revisions triggered by ambiguous results of empirical studies aiming to (dis)prove it. The spillover thesis is then confronted with important methodological and theoretical critiques, the upshot being that in order to be able to arrive at determinate conclusions, more carefully designed empirical studies are needed. Normatively speaking, however, blame can always be laid on the wider environment of market economy and/or representative democracy, to the effect that the spillover thesis is both difficult to disprove and radically subversive. Given the recent dominance of deliberative democratic theory which incorporates a strong participatory element, we finally discuss whether a recent innovation – namely, the concept of deliberative systems – could be fruitfully employed as a flexible umbrella-type framework for the spillover thesis and the participatory ideals related to it.

Anotace anglicky

The paper focuses on the “spillover thesis” which constitutes a pillar of much of contemporary participatory democratic theory; specifically, we assess the claim that workplace democratization leads to a higher degree of political participation amongst labourers. The paper analyses the thesis as formulated by Carole Pateman, including its later revisions triggered by ambiguous results of empirical studies aiming to (dis)prove it. The spillover thesis is then confronted with important methodological and theoretical critiques, the upshot being that in order to be able to arrive at determinate conclusions, more carefully designed empirical studies are needed. Normatively speaking, however, blame can always be laid on the wider environment of market economy and/or representative democracy, to the effect that the spillover thesis is both difficult to disprove and radically subversive. Given the recent dominance of deliberative democratic theory which incorporates a strong participatory element, we finally discuss whether a recent innovation – namely, the concept of deliberative systems – could be fruitfully employed as a flexible umbrella-type framework for the spillover thesis and the participatory ideals related to it.

Návaznosti

• GA16-13980S, projekt VaV: Název: Liberální demokracie v době krize

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Liberální demokracie v době krize