2016
Teze o přelití v participativní demokracii: Empirická relevance a normativní udržitelnost
ČAMBORA, Jan a Pavel DUFEKZákladní údaje
Originální název
Teze o přelití v participativní demokracii: Empirická relevance a normativní udržitelnost
Název anglicky
The Spillover Thesis in Participatory Democratic Theory: Empirical Relevance and Normative Defensibility
Autoři
ČAMBORA, Jan (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Pavel DUFEK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
Politologická revue, 2016, 1211-0353
Další údaje
Jazyk
čeština
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/16:00088535
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
Klíčová slova česky
přelití; Carole Pateman; demokracie na pracovišti; participativní demokracie; deliberativní demokracie
Klíčová slova anglicky
spillover; Carole Pateman; Workplace Democracy; Participatory Democracy; Deliberative Democracy
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 23. 3. 2018 00:13, doc. Mgr. Pavel Dufek, Ph.D.
V originále
The paper focuses on the “spillover thesis” which constitutes a pillar of much of contemporary participatory democratic theory; specifically, we assess the claim that workplace democratization leads to a higher degree of political participation amongst labourers. The paper analyses the thesis as formulated by Carole Pateman, including its later revisions triggered by ambiguous results of empirical studies aiming to (dis)prove it. The spillover thesis is then confronted with important methodological and theoretical critiques, the upshot being that in order to be able to arrive at determinate conclusions, more carefully designed empirical studies are needed. Normatively speaking, however, blame can always be laid on the wider environment of market economy and/or representative democracy, to the effect that the spillover thesis is both difficult to disprove and radically subversive. Given the recent dominance of deliberative democratic theory which incorporates a strong participatory element, we finally discuss whether a recent innovation – namely, the concept of deliberative systems – could be fruitfully employed as a flexible umbrella-type framework for the spillover thesis and the participatory ideals related to it.
Anglicky
The paper focuses on the “spillover thesis” which constitutes a pillar of much of contemporary participatory democratic theory; specifically, we assess the claim that workplace democratization leads to a higher degree of political participation amongst labourers. The paper analyses the thesis as formulated by Carole Pateman, including its later revisions triggered by ambiguous results of empirical studies aiming to (dis)prove it. The spillover thesis is then confronted with important methodological and theoretical critiques, the upshot being that in order to be able to arrive at determinate conclusions, more carefully designed empirical studies are needed. Normatively speaking, however, blame can always be laid on the wider environment of market economy and/or representative democracy, to the effect that the spillover thesis is both difficult to disprove and radically subversive. Given the recent dominance of deliberative democratic theory which incorporates a strong participatory element, we finally discuss whether a recent innovation – namely, the concept of deliberative systems – could be fruitfully employed as a flexible umbrella-type framework for the spillover thesis and the participatory ideals related to it.
Návaznosti
| GA16-13980S, projekt VaV |
|