2017
CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing
SMÍŠEK, R., Lucie MARŠÁNOVÁ, Andrea NĚMCOVÁ, Martin VÍTEK, Jiří KOZUMPLÍK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing
Autoři
SMÍŠEK, R. (203 Česká republika), Lucie MARŠÁNOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Andrea NĚMCOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Martin VÍTEK (203 Česká republika), Jiří KOZUMPLÍK (203 Česká republika) a Marie NOVÁKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, Heidelberg, Springer, 2017, 0140-0118
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
20601 Medical engineering
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.971
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00094605
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000407310300027
Klíčová slova anglicky
Annotation of ECG record; CSE database; ECG; ECG classification; Recommendations; Software testing
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 20. 3. 2018 13:45, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Nowadays, cardiovascular diseases represent the most common cause of death in western countries. Among various examination techniques, electrocardiography (ECG) is still a highly valuable tool used for the diagnosis of many cardiovascular disorders. In order to diagnose a person based on ECG, cardiologists can use automatic diagnostic algorithms. Research in this area is still necessary. In order to compare various algorithms correctly, it is necessary to test them on standard annotated databases, such as the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (CSE) database. According to Scopus, the CSE database is the second most cited standard database. There were two main objectives in this work. First, new diagnoses were added to the CSE database, which extended its original annotations. Second, new recommendations for diagnostic software quality estimation were established. The ECG recordings were diagnosed by five new cardiologists independently, and in total, 59 different diagnoses were found. Such a large number of diagnoses is unique, even in terms of standard databases. Based on the cardiologists’ diagnoses, a four-round consensus (4R consensus) was established. Such a 4R consensus means a correct final diagnosis, which should ideally be the output of any tested classification software. The accuracy of the cardiologists’ diagnoses compared with the 4R consensus was the basis for the establishment of accuracy recommendations. The accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity = 79.20–86.81%, positive predictive value = 79.10–87.11%, and the Jaccard coefficient = 72.21–81.14%, respectively. Within these ranges, the accuracy of the software is comparable with the accuracy of cardiologists. The accuracy quantification of the correct classification is unique. Diagnostic software developers can objectively evaluate the success of their algorithm and promote its further development. The annotations and recommendations proposed in this work will allow for faster development and testing of classification software. As a result, this might facilitate cardiologists’ work and lead to faster diagnoses and earlier treatment.
Návaznosti
GAP102/12/2034, projekt VaV |
|