2016
Tridimensional doppler assessment: a reliable, non-invasive and cost-effective method for preoperative perforator assessment in diep flap
DRAŽAN, Luboš a G.A.G. LOMBARDOZákladní údaje
Originální název
Tridimensional doppler assessment: a reliable, non-invasive and cost-effective method for preoperative perforator assessment in diep flap
Autoři
DRAŽAN, Luboš (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a G.A.G. LOMBARDO (380 Itálie)
Vydání
Acta chirurgiae plasticae, Praha, Česká lékařská společnost J.E.Purkyně, 2016, 0001-5423
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/16:00093334
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
Perforator flap; DIEP; ultrasonography Doppler; preoperative perforator detection; autologous breast reconstruction
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 2. 2017 12:24, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Anotace
V originále
Background. The preoperative perforator mapping is an important step in autologous breast reconstruction, making the flap raising safer, more predictable and time-saving. Although the Doppler exam has proven to be less accurate in locating perforators compared with colour duplex sonography and CTA, it will probably remain of importance in clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to share some advices on how to perform a Doppler exam in preoperative evaluation of a DIEAp flap, increasing its reliability in location of the perforators. Methods: The study was carried-out preoperatively on 26 consecutive patients. For the evaluation of the matching between Doppler Dot and operative finding was used a Cartesian coordinate system Results: We have marked preoperatively 145 perforators in 26 patients for a total of 52 semi-abdomens. An average of 5.6 vessels per patient were marked. Of these, 80 (55.17%) were found between 0–1 cm, 36 (24.82%) between 1–2 cm and 5 (3.4%) of these more than 2 cm from each other. We had 24 (16.55%) false positives in which there was no correspondence between the signal and the intraoperative finding. Conclusion: Although the Doppler exam may not provide the same anatomic details as the other newer modalities, such as CTA and MRA, the HHD remains a very useful and important tool for autologous reconstruction. We recommend performing this exam in our standardized and reproducible method to improve the reliability.