Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure
of the argument

J 2016

Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva

Základní údaje

Originální název

Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument

Autoři

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, Krakow, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Deptartment of Philosophy and Sociology, 2016, 2084-1043

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Stát vydavatele

Polsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/16:00093513

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

argumentation structure; Pascal’s wager; pragma dialectics; rhetorical analysis; strategic maneuvering; topical potential

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 27. 7. 2017 15:17, Mgr. Iva Svačinová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Pascal’s wager is the name of an argument in favor of belief in God presented by Blaise Pascal in §233 of Thoughts. Ian Hacking (1972) pointed out that Pascal’s text involves three different versions of the argument. This paper proceeds from this identification, but it concerns an examination of the rhetorical strategy realized by Pascal’s argumentation. The final form of Pascal’s argument is considered as a product that could be established only through a specific process of persuasion led with respect to an intended reader with a particular set of initial beliefs. The text uses insights from the pragma dialectical approach to argumentation, especially the concept of rhetorical effectiveness of particular choices from the topical potential. The argumentation structure of Pascal’s wager is considered to be a reflection of the anticipated course of dialogue with the reader critically testing the sustainability of Pascal’s standpoint “You should believe in God”. Based on the argumentation reconstruction of three versions of the argument, Pascal’s idea of opponent/audience is identified. A rhetorical analysis of the effects of his argumentative strategy is proposed. The analysis is based on two perspectives on Pascal’s argument: it examines the strategy implemented consistently by all arguments and the strategy of a formulation of different versions of the wager.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0991/2015, interní kód MU

Název: Perspektivy a výzvy filozofických zkoumání

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Perspektivy a výzvy filozofických zkoumání, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal. Krakow: Pedagogical University of Cracow, Deptartment of Philosophy and Sociology, 2016, roč. 6, č. 2, s. 391-412. ISSN 2084-1043.

@article{1372424,
   author = {Svačinová, Iva},
   article_location = {Krakow},
   article_number = {2},
   keywords = {argumentation structure; Pascal’s wager; pragma dialectics; rhetorical analysis; strategic maneuvering; topical potential},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2084-1043},
   journal = {Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal},
   title = {Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument},
   url = {http://www.argument-journal.eu/tom-6-numer-2?lang=en},
   volume = {6},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1372424
AU  - Svačinová, Iva
PY  - 2016
TI  - Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument
JF  - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal
VL  - 6
IS  - 2
SP  - 391-412
EP  - 391-412
PB  - Pedagogical University of Cracow, Deptartment of Philosophy and Sociology
SN  - 20841043
KW  - argumentation structure
KW  - Pascal’s wager
KW  - pragma dialectics
KW  - rhetorical analysis
KW  - strategic maneuvering
KW  - topical potential
UR  - http://www.argument-journal.eu/tom-6-numer-2?lang=en
N2  - Pascal’s wager is the name of an argument in favor of belief in God presented by Blaise Pascal in §233 of Thoughts. Ian Hacking (1972) pointed out that Pascal’s text involves three different versions of the argument. This paper proceeds from this identification, but it concerns an examination of the rhetorical strategy realized by Pascal’s argumentation. The final form of Pascal’s argument is considered as a product that could be established only through a specific process of persuasion led with respect to an intended reader with a particular set of initial beliefs. The text uses insights from the pragma dialectical approach to argumentation, especially the concept of rhetorical effectiveness of particular choices from the topical potential. The argumentation structure of Pascal’s wager is considered to be a reflection of the anticipated course of dialogue with the reader critically testing the sustainability of Pascal’s standpoint “You should believe in God”. Based on the argumentation reconstruction of three versions of the argument, Pascal’s idea of opponent/audience is identified. A rhetorical analysis of the effects of his argumentative strategy is proposed. The analysis is based on two perspectives on Pascal’s argument: it examines the strategy implemented consistently by all arguments and the strategy of a formulation of different versions of the wager.
ER  -

SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Pascal’s wager : tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument. \textit{Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal}. Krakow: Pedagogical University of Cracow, Deptartment of Philosophy and Sociology, 2016, roč.~6, č.~2, s.~391-412. ISSN~2084-1043.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci