2017
Adoption of Strategic Management Accounting Techniques in Czech and Slovak Companies
BOUČKOVÁ, Markéta a Ladislav ŠIŠKAZákladní údaje
Originální název
Adoption of Strategic Management Accounting Techniques in Czech and Slovak Companies
Autoři
BOUČKOVÁ, Markéta (203 Česká republika) a Ladislav ŠIŠKA (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
1. vyd. Cham, New Trends in Finance and Accounting: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Finance and Accounting, od s. 559-569, 11 s. 2017
Nakladatel
Springer
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
50600 5.6 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14560/17:00096171
Organizační jednotka
Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
ISBN
978-3-319-49558-3
ISSN
UT WoS
000416113500051
Klíčová slova anglicky
Strategic Management Accounting; Management Accounting Techniques; Customer Focus; Competitor Focus
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 31. 5. 2022 14:37, RNDr. Pavel Šmerk, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The purpose of this paper is to classify strategic management accounting (SMA) techniques. More specifically, two objectives were stated: (1) to derive a classi-fication of SMA theoretically and then (2) to verify such classification empiri-cally. To achieve these objectives, our study deploys literature review and empir-ical survey. Convenience sample of 99 profit seeking companies domiciled in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic was analyzed by means of descriptive sta-tistics and principal component analysis. The latter method identified three broader categories of SMA techniques: Internally focused; Competitor focused; Stakeholder focused SMA techniques. Such findings only partly correspond to the theoretically derived classification that enumerates five broader categories, which were identified in SMA literature: Product accounting; Process account-ing; Customer accounting; Competitor accounting; Performance measurement. The comparison of both classifications reveals that respondents perceived inter-nally focused groups of SMA techniques similarly and did not differentiate among them. Further detailed analysis also shows influence of some control var-iables such as industry, size of the respondent's company or differences between independent enterprises and subsidiaries/parent companies.