2016
The meaning of sampling density in multiple repeat prostate biopsies
HRBÁČEK, Jan, Otakar ČAPOUN, Ivo MINÁRIK, Michal KÝR, Tomáš HANUŠ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The meaning of sampling density in multiple repeat prostate biopsies
Autoři
HRBÁČEK, Jan (203 Česká republika), Otakar ČAPOUN (203 Česká republika), Ivo MINÁRIK (203 Česká republika), Michal KÝR (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Tomáš HANUŠ (203 Česká republika), Marek BABJUK (203 Česká republika) a Roman SOBOTKA (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Central European Journal of Urology, Warsaw, Panstwowy Zaklad Wydawnictw Lekarskich, 2016, 2080-4806
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Stát vydavatele
Polsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/16:00094066
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000392860500006
Klíčová slova anglicky
biopsy; cancer detection; prostate cancer
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 4. 4. 2017 09:39, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Anotace
V originále
Introduction Extended transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is a state-of-the-art tool for prostate cancer detection. Nevertheless, approximately 1/3 of cancers are missed when using this method and repeat biopsy sessions are often required. The aim of this study was to investigate how sampling density (a compound variable reflecting the number of biopsy cores and prostate volume) impacts on detection rate in multiple repeat TRUS-biopsies. Material and methods A total of 1007 consecutive patients undergoing their 1st, 2nd, 3rd and any further repeat prostate biopsies were included. The relationship between sampling density and other clinical variables (age, prostate-specific antigen level, free/total PSA ratio, digital rectal examination, number of previous biopsies) and cancer detection rate were assessed by interaction analysis. Results There were 562 primary re-biopsies, 267 second re-biopsies and 178 third and further re-biopsies included in the study. Detection rate was 25.4%, 25.8% and 25.3%, respectively. Interaction of sampling density with age was demonstrated in patients undergoing their first repeat biopsy (but not further rebiopsies). No interaction was observed with other variables investigated. Conclusions A more extensive prostate sampling leads to a higher cancer detection rate on repeat prostate biopsies, as shown previously. However, this effect seems to be particularly pronounced in men younger than 65 years undergoing their first repeat prostate biopsy.