Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the
European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design

J 2017

Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design

KOSAŘ, David

Základní údaje

Originální název

Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Utrecht Law Review, Utrecht, Utrecht University School of Law, 2017, 1871-515X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/17:00096600

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ulr.368

UT WoS

000403238400002

Klíčová slova česky

soudy; soudci; Evropský soud pro lidská práva; justiční politika; judicializace; dělba moci; soudcovská nezávislost; reforma justice

Klíčová slova anglicky

courts; judges; European Court of Human Rights; judicial politics; judicialization; separation of powers; judicial independence; judicial reforms

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 15. 7. 2020 08:59, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This article discusses to what extent and how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has initiated and engaged in domestic judicial reforms. It shows that the judgments of the Strasbourg Court, rather than having effects only with respect to the individual whose rights have been violated, have much deeper structural effects in the design and operation of domestic judicial systems. This article argues that this phenomenon goes rather unnoticed, but it has deep implications for both the developing and developed European democracies. To demonstrate this phenomenon, this article assesses the impact of the ECtHR on three judicial design issues. First, it illustrates how the ECtHR has challenged the role of the advocates general. Second, it explains how the ECtHR has gradually curbed the jurisdiction of military courts both over civilians and over military officers, which has brought these courts to the brink of their abolition. Finally, it outlines how the ECtHR in its judgments regarding the disciplining of judges empowers the judiciary at the expense of other political institutions within the State. Based on the analysis of these three judicial design issues, we conclude that the Strasbourg Court is affecting the internal architecture of domestic judiciaries as it gradually endorses the unification of court administration and changes the power structures within the judiciary.

Přiložené soubory

2017_KOSAR_-_Nudging_Domestic___Judicial_Reforms_from_Strasbourg_ULR.pdf

Vyhledat podobné dokumenty

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David. Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design. Utrecht Law Review. Utrecht: Utrecht University School of Law, 2017, roč. 13, č. 1, s. 112-123. ISSN 1871-515X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ulr.368.

@article{1379636,
   author = {Kosař, David},
   article_location = {Utrecht},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ulr.368},
   keywords = {courts; judges; European Court of Human Rights; judicial politics; judicialization; separation of powers; judicial independence; judicial reforms},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1871-515X},
   journal = {Utrecht Law Review},
   title = {Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design},
   url = {https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.368/},
   volume = {13},
   year = {2017}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1379636
AU  - Kosař, David
PY  - 2017
TI  - Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design
JF  - Utrecht Law Review
VL  - 13
IS  - 1
SP  - 112-123
EP  - 112-123
PB  - Utrecht University School of Law
SN  - 1871515X
KW  - courts
KW  - judges
KW  - European Court of Human Rights
KW  - judicial politics
KW  - judicialization
KW  - separation of powers
KW  - judicial independence
KW  - judicial reforms
UR  - https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.368/
L2  - https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.368/
N2  - This article discusses to what extent and how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has initiated and engaged in domestic judicial reforms. It shows that the judgments of the Strasbourg Court, rather than having effects only with respect to the individual whose rights have been violated, have much deeper structural effects in the design and operation of domestic judicial systems. This article argues that this phenomenon goes rather unnoticed, but it has deep implications for both the developing and developed European democracies. To demonstrate this phenomenon, this article assesses the impact of the ECtHR on three judicial design issues. First, it illustrates how the ECtHR has challenged the role of the advocates general. Second, it explains how the ECtHR has gradually curbed the jurisdiction of military courts both over civilians and over military officers, which has brought these courts to the brink of their abolition. Finally, it outlines how the ECtHR in its judgments regarding the disciplining of judges empowers the judiciary at the expense of other political institutions within the State. Based on the analysis of these three judicial design issues, we conclude that the Strasbourg Court is affecting the internal architecture of domestic judiciaries as it gradually endorses the unification of court administration and changes the power structures within the judiciary.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David. Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design. \textit{Utrecht Law Review}. Utrecht: Utrecht University School of Law, 2017, roč.~13, č.~1, s.~112-123. ISSN~1871-515X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ulr.368.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci