CAHA, Pavel. Explaining Bobaljik’s Root Suppletion Generalization as an Instance of the Adjacency Condition (and Beyond). In Emonds, Joseph; Janebová, Markéta. Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016. Olomouc: Palacký University, 2017, p. 193-207. ISBN 978-80-244-5172-5.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Explaining Bobaljik’s Root Suppletion Generalization as an Instance of the Adjacency Condition (and Beyond)
Authors CAHA, Pavel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Olomouc, Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016, p. 193-207, 15 pp. 2017.
Publisher Palacký University
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 60203 Linguistics
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/17:00094810
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
ISBN 978-80-244-5172-5
Keywords in English suppletion; comparatives; RSG; adjacency; words
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Marie Skřivanová, učo 262124. Changed: 6/3/2018 13:13.
Abstract
Bobaljik (2012) observes on the basis of an impressive sample of languages that root suppletion is hardly ever conditioned by degree markers that do not form a word with the root. He calls this the Root Suppletion Generalization (RSG). If true, the generalization provides a possible argument for the lexicalist position: RSG can be seen as a consequence of the lexicalist architecture, where words are built pre-syntax, and therefore syntax cannot influence their shape (Williams 2007). Against this background, this paper discusses evidence (some of it presented already in Bobaljik’s work) that the RSG (when stated over words) is empirically (sometimes) too weak and (sometimes also) too strong. In view of these observations, I suggest a way in which all of these examples can be captured in ways that do not lend any support to lexicalism, simply because the word is not the relevant notion for blocking suppletion.
Links
GA17-10144S, research and development projectName: Lineární kontiguita v jazyce
Investor: Czech Science Foundation
PrintDisplayed: 20/6/2024 07:57