2017
SSh versus TSE sequence protocol in rapid MR examination of pediatric patients with programmable drainage system
BRICHTOVÁ, Eva a Jan ŠENKYŘÍKZákladní údaje
Originální název
SSh versus TSE sequence protocol in rapid MR examination of pediatric patients with programmable drainage system
Autoři
BRICHTOVÁ, Eva (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Jan ŠENKYŘÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Childs nervous system, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2017, 0256-7040
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30103 Neurosciences
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.235
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00097343
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000403477000007
Klíčová slova anglicky
Rapid magnetic resonance imaging; Susceptibility artifact; TSE sequence; Ventriculoperitoneal drainage; Pediatric patients
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 20. 3. 2018 16:21, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Purpose A low radiation burden is essential during diagnostic procedures in pediatric patients due to their high tissue sensitivity. Using MR examination instead of the routinely used CT reduces the radiation exposure and the risk of adverse stochastic effects. Our retrospective study evaluated the possibility of using ultrafast single-shot (SSh) sequences and turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences in rapid MR brain imaging in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus and a programmable ventriculo peritoneal drainage system. Methods SSh sequences seem to be suitable for examining pediatric patients due to the speed of using this technique, but significant susceptibility artifacts due to the programmable drainage valve degrade the image quality. Therefore, a rapid MR examination protocol based on TSE sequences, less sensitive to artifacts due to ferromagnetic components, has been developed. Of 61 pediatric patients who were examined using MR and the SSh sequence protocol, a group of 15 patients with hydrocephalus and a programmable drainage system also underwent TSE sequence MR imaging. The susceptibility artifact volume in both rapid MR protocols was evaluated using a semiautomatic volumetry system. Results A statistically significant decrease in the susceptibility artifact volume has been demonstrated in TSE sequence imaging in comparison with SSh sequences. Using TSE sequences reduced the influence of artifacts from the programmable valve, and the image quality in all cases was rated as excellent. In all patients, rapid MR examinations were performed without any need for intravenous sedation or general anesthesia. Conclusions Our study results strongly suggest the superiority of the TSE sequence MR protocol compared to the SSh sequence protocol in pediatric patients with a programmable ventriculoperitoneal drainage system due to a significant reduction of susceptibility artifact volume. Both rapid sequence MR protocols provide quick and satisfactory brain imaging with no ionizing radiation and a reduced need for intravenous or general anesthesia.