2017
Correlates of Arrhythmia Recurrence After Hybrid Epi- and Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
BULAVA, Alan, Ales MOKRACEK, Jiri HANIS, Martin EISENBERGER, Vojtech KURFIRST et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Correlates of Arrhythmia Recurrence After Hybrid Epi- and Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Autoři
BULAVA, Alan (203 Česká republika), Ales MOKRACEK (203 Česká republika), Jiri HANIS (203 Česká republika), Martin EISENBERGER (203 Česká republika), Vojtech KURFIRST (203 Česká republika) a Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2017, 1941-3149
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.728
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00097430
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000407553700008
Klíčová slova anglicky
atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; endocardium; follow-up studies; ligaments; surgical procedure; cardiovascular
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 9. 10. 2017 16:22, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Long-term efficacy of catheter-based treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation is unsatisfactory. Minimally invasive surgical ablation techniques have been developed recently, but their efficacy has never been systematically tested. Methods and Results—Seventy patients (median age, 63.5 years) with persistent atrial fibrillation underwent epicardial thoracoscopic radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablation, Marshal ligament disruption, and exclusion of the left atrial appendage. The procedure was followed by electroanatomic mapping and ablation (EAM) 2 to 3 months later. Only 76% of patients were in normal sinus rhythm at the beginning of EAM. All 4 pulmonary veins and the left atrium posterior wall were found isolated in 69% and 23% of patients, respectively. Arrhythmia-free survival off antiarrhythmic drugs 12 months after EAM was 77%. Using previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs and reablation procedures, arrhythmia free-survival increased to 97% during follow-up (mean, 936±432 days; range, 346–1509 days). The majority of arrhythmia recurrences occurred during the first 12 months after EAM. In a multivariable-adjusted estimates, left atrium volume >165 mL, absent normal sinus rhythm at admission for EAM, and inducibility of any sustained tachyarrhythmia at the end of EAM procedure were identified as independent correlates of atrial fibrillation recurrence. Conclusions—Our report demonstrated that the majority of patients after epicardial ablation, using bipolar radiofrequency instruments, required endocardial catheter ablation to complete the linear ablation lesions and a significant proportion of patients required spot-ablations to complete electric pulmonary vein isolation. Noninducibility of any arrhythmia after a staged hybrid procedure seemed to be the strongest correlate of long-term arrhythmia-free survival.