2017
Classification of European beech forests: a Gordian Knot?
WILLNER, Wolfgang, Francisco De Borja JIMÉNEZ-ALFARO GONZÁLEZ, Emiliano AGRILLO, Idoia BIURRUN, Juan Antonio CAMPOS et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Classification of European beech forests: a Gordian Knot?
Autoři
WILLNER, Wolfgang (40 Rakousko), Francisco De Borja JIMÉNEZ-ALFARO GONZÁLEZ (724 Španělsko, domácí), Emiliano AGRILLO (380 Itálie), Idoia BIURRUN (724 Španělsko), Juan Antonio CAMPOS (724 Španělsko), Andraž ČARNI (705 Slovinsko), Laura CASELLA (380 Itálie), János CSIKY (348 Maďarsko), Renata ĆUŠTEREVSKA (807 Severní Makedonie), Yakiv P. DIDUKH (804 Ukrajina), Jörg EWALD (276 Německo), Ute JANDT (276 Německo), Florian JANSEN (276 Německo), Zygmunt Walerian KACKI (616 Polsko), Ali KAVGACI (792 Turecko), Jonathan LENOIR (250 Francie), Aleksander MARINŠEK (705 Slovinsko), Viktor ONYSHCHENKO (804 Ukrajina), John S. RODWELL (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko), Joop H. J. SCHAMINÉE (528 Nizozemské království), Jozef ŠIBÍK (703 Slovensko), Željko ŠKVORC (191 Chorvatsko), Jens-Christian SVENNING (208 Dánsko), Ioannis TSIRIPIDIS (300 Řecko), Pavel Dan TURTUREANU (642 Rumunsko), Rossen TZONEV (100 Bulharsko), Kiril VASSILEV (100 Bulharsko), Roberto VENANZONI (380 Itálie), Thomas WOHLGEMUTH (756 Švýcarsko) a Milan CHYTRÝ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
Applied Vegetation Science, NJ USA, Wiley, 2017, 1402-2001
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.331
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/17:00095124
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000403676000017
Klíčová slova anglicky
Beech forest; Europe; Fagetalia sylvaticae; Fagion sylvaticae; Fagus sylvatica; Luzulo-Fagion sylvaticae; Syntaxonomy; TWINSPAN; Vegetation plot database
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 30. 3. 2018 08:43, Ing. Nicole Zrilić
Anotace
V originále
Questions: What are the main floristic patterns in European beech forests? Which classification at the alliance and suballiance level is the most convincing? - Location: Europe and Asia Minor. - Methods: We applied a TWINSPAN classification to a data set of 24605 releves covering the whole range of Fagus sylvatica forests and the western part of Fagus orientalis forests. We identified 24 operational phytosociological units' (OPUs), which were used for further analysis. The position of each OPU along the soil pH and temperature gradient was evaluated using Ellenberg Indicator Values. Fidelity of species to OPUs was calculated using the phi coefficient and constancy ratio. We compared alternative alliance concepts, corresponding to groups of OPUs, in terms of number and frequency of diagnostic species. We also established formal definitions for the various alliance concepts based on comparison of the total cover of the diagnostic species groups, and evaluated alternative geographical subdivisions of beech forests. - Results: The first and second division levels of TWINSPAN followed the temperature and soil pH gradients, while lower divisions were mainly geographical. We grouped the 22 OPUs of Fagus sylvatica forests into acidophytic, meso-basiphytic and thermo-basiphytic beech forests, and separated two OPUs of F.orientalis forests. However, a solution with only two ecologically defined alliances of F.sylvatica forests (acidophytic vs basiphytic) was clearly superior with regard to number and frequency of diagnostic species. In contrast, when comparing groupings with three to six geographical alliances of basiphytic beech forests, respectively, we did not find a strongly superior solution. - Conclusions: We propose to classify F.sylvatica forests into 15 suballiances - three acidophytic and 12 basiphytic ones. Separating these two groups at alliance or order level was clearly supported by our results. Concerning the grouping of the 12 basiphytic suballiances into ecological or geographical alliances, as advocated by many authors, we failed to find an optimal solution. Therefore, we propose a multi-dimensional classification of basiphytic beech forests, including both ecological and geographical groups as equally valid concepts which may be used alternatively depending on the purpose and context of the classification.
Návaznosti
GB14-36079G, projekt VaV |
|