Czech national report on Optional Choice of Court Agreements - Fukuoka Congress 2018

ROZEHNALOVÁ, Naděžda, Lucie ZAVADILOVÁ a Silvie MAHDALOVÁ. Czech national report on Optional Choice of Court Agreements - Fukuoka Congress 2018. 2017.

Základní údaje

• Originální název: Czech national report on Optional Choice of Court Agreements - Fukuoka Congress 2018
• Název česky: Národní zpráva za Českou republiku - dohoda o nevýlučném výběru soudů - Fukuoka kongres 2018
• Autoři: ROZEHNALOVÁ, Naděžda, Lucie ZAVADILOVÁ a Silvie MAHDALOVÁ.
• Vydání: 2017.

Další údaje

• Originální jazyk: angličtina
• Typ výsledku: Výzkumná zpráva
• Obor: 50500 5.5 Law
• Utajení: není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
• Organizační jednotka: Právnická fakulta
• Klíčová slova česky: dohoda o výběru soudů - výlučná dohoda - nevýlučná dohoda - právní regulace
• Klíčová slova anglicky: choice of court agreement - optional choice of court agreement - exclusive choice of court agreement
• Příznaky: Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Anotace

Agreements on jurisdiction are and have been regulated in the Czech Republic by a number of legal norms of domestic, European and international origin. Despite the existence of a favourable legal environment (and professional legal literature recommendations), parties’ agreements on jurisdiction do not constitute the preferred manner of establishing court jurisdiction, either at the national or international level. This is due to several reasons, some of which are historically conditioned and the outcome of a certain force of habit. With respect to the national level, it is important to note that until 1991 all disputes between companies were processed within the framework of a special economic arbitration, i.e. not before the courts.

Anotace česky

Agreements on jurisdiction are and have been regulated in the Czech Republic by a number of legal norms of domestic, European and international origin. Despite the existence of a favourable legal environment (and professional legal literature recommendations), parties’ agreements on jurisdiction do not constitute the preferred manner of establishing court jurisdiction, either at the national or international level. This is due to several reasons, some of which are historically conditioned and the outcome of a certain force of habit. With respect to the national level, it is important to note that until 1991 all disputes between companies were processed within the framework of a special economic arbitration, i.e. not before the courts.