J 2017

Reference values of cardio-ankle vascular index in a random sample of a white population

WOHLFAHRT, P., R. CIFKOVA, N. MOVSISYAN, Šárka KUNZOVÁ, Jiří LEŠOVSKÝ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Reference values of cardio-ankle vascular index in a random sample of a white population

Autoři

WOHLFAHRT, P. (203 Česká republika), R. CIFKOVA (203 Česká republika), N. MOVSISYAN (203 Česká republika), Šárka KUNZOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Jiří LEŠOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika), M. HOMOLKA (203 Česká republika), Vladimír SOŠKA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr DOBŠÁK (203 Česká republika, domácí), F. LOPEZ-JIMENEZ (840 Spojené státy) a Ondřej SOCHOR (203 Česká republika, garant)

Vydání

journal of Hypertension, PHILADELPHIA, William and Wilkins, 2017, 0263-6352

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.099

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/17:00098395

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000411899000018

Klíčová slova anglicky

arterial stiffness; cardio-ankle vascular index; reference values; white population

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 20. 3. 2018 18:43, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Objectives: Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a parameter of arterial stiffness, has been increasingly used for cardiovascular risk estimation. Currently used CAVI reference values are derived from the Japanese population. It is not clear whether the same reference values can be used in the white population. The aim of the present study was to describe cardiovascular risk factors influencing CAVI and to establish CAVI reference values. Methods: A total of 2160 individuals randomly selected from the Brno city population aged 25-65 years were examined. Of these, 1347 patients were free from cardiovascular disease, nondiabetic and untreated by antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs, forming the reference value population. CAVI was measured using the VaSera VS-1000 device (Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo, Japan). Results: At each blood pressure (BP) level, there was a quadratic association between CAVI and age, except for a linear association in the optimal BP group. Although there was no association between BP and CAVI in younger patients, there was a linear association between CAVI and BP after 40 years of age. Reference values by age and sex were established. In each age group, except for the male 60-65-year group, reference values in our population were lower than in the Japanese one with the difference ranging from -0.29 to 0.21 for men, and from -0.38 to -0.03 for women. Conclusion: This is the first study providing CAVI reference values in a random sample of the white population. Our results suggest that the currently used values slightly overestimate CAVI in younger white, possibly underestimating cardiovascular risk.