J 2017

Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1

MATEOS, M.V., T. MASSZI, N. GRZASKO, M. HANSSON, I. SANDHU et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1

Autoři

MATEOS, M.V., T. MASSZI, N. GRZASKO, M. HANSSON, I. SANDHU, Luděk POUR, L. VITERBO, S.R. JACKSON, A.M. STOPPA, P. GIMSING, M. HAMADANI, G. BORSARU, D. BERG, J.C. LIN, A. DI BACCO, H. VAN DE VELDE, P.G. RICHARDSON a P. MOREAU

Vydání

haematologica, PAVIA, FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION, 2017, 0390-6078

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30200 3.2 Clinical medicine

Stát vydavatele

Itálie

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 9.090

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000411964200029

Klíčová slova anglicky

ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 4. 2018 18:45, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Prior treatment exposure in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma may affect outcomes with subsequent therapies. We analyzed efficacy and safety according to prior treatment in the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) versus placebo-Rd. Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received ixazomib-Rd or placebo-Rd. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in subgroups defined according to type (proteasome inhibitor [ PI] and immunomodulatory drug) and number (1 vs. 2 or 3) of prior therapies received. Of 722 patients, 503 (70%) had received a prior PI, and 397 (55%) prior lenalidomide/thalidomide; 425 patients had received 1 prior therapy, and 297 received 2 or 3 prior therapies. At a median follow up of similar to 15 months, PFS was prolonged with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd regardless of type of prior therapy received; HR 0.739 and 0.749 in PI-exposed and -naive patients, HR 0.744 and 0.700 in immunomodulatory-drug-exposed and -naive patients, respectively. PFS benefit with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd appeared greater in patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies (HR 0.58) and in those with 1 prior therapy without prior transplant (HR 0.60) versus those with 1 prior therapy and transplant (HR 1.23). Across all subgroups, toxicity was consistent with that seen in the intent-to-treat population. In patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-Rd was associated with a consistent clinical benefit vs. placebo-Rd regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or immunomodulatory drugs. Patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, or 1 prior therapy without transplant seemed to have greater benefit than patients with 1 prior therapy and transplant.