2017
To obey or to atone: the role of kneeling in religious ritual
KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ, EvaZákladní údaje
Originální název
To obey or to atone: the role of kneeling in religious ritual
Autoři
Vydání
The evolution of religion II: How Biology, Psychology and Culture Interact, 2017
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
náboženský rituál; embodiment; klečení; pokání; podřízenost; HRAF; databázové testování
Klíčová slova anglicky
religious ritual; embodiment; kneeling; atonement; subordination; HRAF; database testing
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 1. 2018 11:12, Mgr. et Mgr. Eva Kundtová Klocová, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Religious rituals come in a large variety of forms compiled from diverse components and attributes. One such variable is the manipulation of body postures of ritual participants. Some ritual forms specify or even codify details of body postures to be assumed, while other come with no such requirements. Although there is no single body posture uniquely associated with ritual practice, the ubiquity of submissive postures (e.g. kneeling, prostration) across cultures suggest a possible common underlying function. Current embodied cognition theories claim that body postures play an important role in composition of specific embodied states. Thus, bodily positions are not just the result of some antecedent emotional state; they are a necessary part of the emergence and shaping of states. In the light of existing research, I argue that submissive bodily positions in religious rituals are not mere expressions of specific affective states, but that they establish and regulate attitude and behaviour. Closed, collapsed and lowered postures are generally perceived as either expressing submission and obedience or shame and atonement. Therefore, depending on the associated affective state (submission or shame), these postures might either emphasize power dichotomy between the superhuman agents and human participants, or signal conformity with moral norms. To test these hypotheses, I use data collected from the Human Relations Area Files electronic databases (eHRAF) and the coded variables from Standard Cross Cultural Sample (SCCS). If submissive positions serve as reminders of subservient position of human agents, they are expected to correlate with the belief in high gods (including high gods not concerned with morality) and hierarchized religious organization. If they serve to signal moral conformity, they are expected to be associated with the moral concerns and specifically with atonement and repentance.
Návaznosti
EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV |
|