k 2017

To obey or to atone: the role of kneeling in religious ritual

KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ, Eva

Základní údaje

Originální název

To obey or to atone: the role of kneeling in religious ritual

Vydání

The evolution of religion II: How Biology, Psychology and Culture Interact, 2017

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

náboženský rituál; embodiment; klečení; pokání; podřízenost; HRAF; databázové testování

Klíčová slova anglicky

religious ritual; embodiment; kneeling; atonement; subordination; HRAF; database testing

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 1. 2018 11:12, Mgr. et Mgr. Eva Kundtová Klocová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Religious rituals come in a large variety of forms compiled from diverse components and attributes. One such variable is the manipulation of body postures of ritual participants. Some ritual forms specify or even codify details of body postures to be assumed, while other come with no such requirements. Although there is no single body posture uniquely associated with ritual practice, the ubiquity of submissive postures (e.g. kneeling, prostration) across cultures suggest a possible common underlying function. Current embodied cognition theories claim that body postures play an important role in composition of specific embodied states. Thus, bodily positions are not just the result of some antecedent emotional state; they are a necessary part of the emergence and shaping of states. In the light of existing research, I argue that submissive bodily positions in religious rituals are not mere expressions of specific affective states, but that they establish and regulate attitude and behaviour. Closed, collapsed and lowered postures are generally perceived as either expressing submission and obedience or shame and atonement. Therefore, depending on the associated affective state (submission or shame), these postures might either emphasize power dichotomy between the superhuman agents and human participants, or signal conformity with moral norms. To test these hypotheses, I use data collected from the Human Relations Area Files electronic databases (eHRAF) and the coded variables from Standard Cross Cultural Sample (SCCS). If submissive positions serve as reminders of subservient position of human agents, they are expected to correlate with the belief in high gods (including high gods not concerned with morality) and hierarchized religious organization. If they serve to signal moral conformity, they are expected to be associated with the moral concerns and specifically with atonement and repentance.

Návaznosti

EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV
Název: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství