Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1403511,
author = {Huge, Jean and Rochette, AnneandJulie and Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc and DahdouhandGuebas, Farid and Koedam, Nico and Vanhove, Maarten Pieterjan},
article_location = {OXFORD},
article_number = {September},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.003},
keywords = {Biodiversity; Development cooperation; Environmental impact assessment (ETA); Africa; Baseline},
language = {eng},
issn = {1462-9011},
journal = {ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLICY},
title = {Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation},
volume = {75},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1403511
AU - Huge, Jean - Rochette, Anne-Julie - Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc - Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid - Koedam, Nico - Vanhove, Maarten Pieterjan
PY - 2017
TI - Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation
JF - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLICY
VL - 75
IS - September
SP - 91-102
EP - 91-102
PB - ELSEVIER SCI LTD
SN - 14629011
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Development cooperation
KW - Environmental impact assessment (ETA)
KW - Africa
KW - Baseline
N2 - Biodiversity is under threat from anthropogenic pressures, in particular in biodiversity-rich developing countries. Development cooperation actors, who traditionally focus on the improvement of socio-economic conditions in the South, are increasingly acknowledging the linkages between poverty and biodiversity, e.g. by referring to the ecosystem services framework. However, there are many different framings which stress the need for biodiversity integration and which influence how biodiversity and development are and/or should be linked. Moreover, there is a gap between the lip service paid to biodiversity integration and the reality of development cooperation interventions. This study analyses how biodiversity framings are reflected in environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice, and how these framings influence EIA and decision-making. The findings, based on an in-depth qualitative analysis of World Bank EIAs undertaken in West Africa, indicate the incoherent quality but also the dominance of the 'utilitarian' and 'corrective' framings, which respectively stress human use of nature and mitigation of negative unintended development impacts. Identifying and highlighting these discursive trends leads to increased awareness of the importance of biodiversity among all development actors in North and South. However, some framings may lead to an overly narrow human-centred approach which downplays the intrinsic value of biodiversity. This study proposes recommendations for an improved integration of biodiversity in development cooperation, including the need for more systematic baseline studies in EIAs.
ER -
HUGE, Jean, Anne-Julie ROCHETTE, Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN, Farid DAHDOUH-GUEBAS, Nico KOEDAM a Maarten Pieterjan VANHOVE. Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation. \textit{ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLICY}. OXFORD: ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2017, roč.~75, September, s.~91-102. ISSN~1462-9011. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.003.
|
